Quản trị rủi ro doanh nghiệp, cấu trúc công nghệ thông tin và thành quả hoạt động của doanh nghiệp: Vai trò trung gian của lợi thế cạnh tranh

Thanh Trần Thị Phương; Thoa Đậu Thị Kim; Hoa Trần Anh; Lam Phạm Trà

doi:10.24311/jabes/2022.33.08.01

Các tác giả

Trần Thị Phương Thanh Trường Đại học Kinh tế TP. Hồ Chí Minh Tác giả
Đậu Thị Kim Thoa Trường Đại học Kinh tế TP. Hồ Chí Minh Tác giả
Trần Anh Hoa Trường Đại học Kinh tế TP. Hồ Chí Minh Tác giả
Phạm Trà Lam Trường Đại học Kinh tế TP. Hồ Chí Minh Tác giả

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24311/jabes/2022.33.08.01

Tóm tắt

Trong môi trường kinh doanh biến động và bất ổn như hiện tại, cùng với cuộc khủng hoảng do đại dịch COVID 19 đang diễn ra trên phạm vi toàn cầu, quản trị rủi ro doanh nghiệp (QTRRDN) ngày càng trở nên quan trọng cho sự tồn tại và phát triển của các doanh nghiệp. Tuy nhiên, các nghiên cứu thực nghiệm về QTRRDN và thành quả hoạt động của doanh nghiệp, đặc biệt, trong môi trường ứng dụng công nghệ thông tin (CNTT) mạnh mẽ hiện nay chưa được nghiên cứu một cách thấu đáo. Nghiên cứu này đã tập trung kiểm tra một mô hình đường dẫn về QTRRDN, cấu trúc CNTT, lợi thế cạnh tranh, và thành quả hoạt động của doanh nghiệp. Dữ liệu được thu thập từ 186 doanh nghiệp tại Việt Nam phân tích bằng kỹ thuật PLS cho thấy, QTRRDN và cấu trúc CNTT tác động tích cực đáng kể đến lợi thế cạnh tranh của doanh nghiệp. Đến lượt nó, lợi thế cạnh tranh là yếu tố quan trọng ảnh hưởng đến thành quả hoạt động của doanh nghiệp. Các khám phá của nghiên cứu này đã gợi mở những hàm ý quản trị với việc tập trung vào QTRRDN và cấu trúc CNTT để tăng cường lợi thế cạnh tranh và thành quả hoạt động của doanh nghiệp.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Ahmed, I., & Manab, N. A. (2016). Influence of enterprise risk management success factors on firm financial and non-financial performance: A proposed model. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 6(3), 1–7.

Ariyawardana, A. (2003). Sources of competitive advantage and firm performance: The case of Sri Lankan value-added tea producers. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 1(20), 73–90.

Armstrong, J. S., & Overton, T. S. (1977). Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys. Journal of Marketing Research, 14(3), 396–402.

Barney, J. (1991). Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120.

Beasley, M. S., Clune, R., & Hermanson, D. R. (2005). Enterprise risk management: An empirical analysis of factors associated with the extent of implementation. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 24(6), 521–531.

Bergeron, F., & Raymond, L. (1992). Planning of information systems to gain a competitive edge. Journal of Small Business Management, 30(1), 21–26.

Bergeron, F., Raymond, L., & Rivard, S. (2004). Ideal patterns of strategic alignment and business performance. Information & Management, 41(8), 1003–1020.

Bromiley, P., McShane, M., Nair, A., & Rustambekov, E. (2015). Enterprise risk management: Review, critique, and research directions. Long Range Planning, 48(4), 265–276.

Chenhall, R. H. (2003). Management control systems design within its organizational context: Findings from contingency-based research and directions for the future. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 28(2–3), 127–168.

Chin, W. W. (1998). Commentary: Issues and opinion on structural equation modeling. MIS Quarterly, 22(1), 7–16.

Chuang, S. H., Liao, C., & Lin, S. (2013). Determinants of knowledge management with information technology support impact on firm performance. Information Technology and Management, 14(3), 217–230.

COSO, I. I. (2004). Enterprise risk management - Integrated framework. Retrieved from https://erm.ncsu.edu/library/article/coso-erm-framework

Dehning, B., & Stratopoulos, T. (2003). Determinants of a sustainable competitive advantage due to an IT-enabled strategy. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 12(1), 7–28.

Dwivedi, Y. K., Lal, B., Williams, M. D., Schneberger, S. L., & Wade, M. (2009). Handbook of Research on Contemporary Theoretical Models in Information Systems. Igi Global.

El-Dalabeeh, A. R., & ALshbiel, S. O. (2019). The effect of enterprise risk management in the relationship between the balanced scorecard and organizational performance in Jordan. International Journal of Scientific and Technology Research, 8(9), 1899–1906.

Elahi, E. (2013). Risk management: The next source of competitive advantage. Foresight, 15(2),

117–131.

Galbraith, J. (1973). Designing Complex Organizations. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

Hair Jr, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C., & Sarstedt, M. (2016). A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). SAGE Publications.

Hair Jr, J. F., Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., & Gudergan, S. P. (2017). Advanced Issues in Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling. SAGE Publications.

Hoyt, R. E., & Liebenberg, A. P. (2011). The value of enterprise risk management. Journal of Risk and Insurance, 78(4), 795–822.

Hussain, M., & Hoque, Z. (2002). Understanding non‐financial performance measurement practices in Japanese banks. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 15(2), 162–183.

Jean-Jules, J., & Vicente, R. (2021). Rethinking the implementation of enterprise risk management as a socio-technical challenge. Journal of Risk Research, 26(2), 247–266.

Judge, W. Q., Naoumova, I., & Koutzevol, N. (2003). Corporate governance and firm performance in Russia: An empirical study. Journal of World Business, 38(4), 385–396.

Kim, Y. J., Song, S., Sambamurthy, V., & Lee, Y. L. (2012). Entrepreneurship, knowledge integration capability, and firm performance: An empirical study. Information Systems Frontiers, 14(5), 1047–1060.

Kock, N. (2015). Common method bias in PLS-SEM: A full collinearity assessment approach. International Journal of e-Collaboration (IJEC), 11(4), 1–10.

Kommunuri, J., Narayan, A., Wheaton, M., & Jandug, L. (2015). Enterprise risk management and firm performance empirical evidence from Vietnam. Retrieved from https://cdn.auckland.ac.nz/assets/business/about/our-departments/od-accounting-finance/NZMAS%20Symposium%202016/Enterprise%20Risk%20Management%20and%20Firm%20Performance_John%20Kommunuri.pdf

Lai, F. W. (2011). A strategic framework for value enhancing enterprise risk management. Journal of Global Business and Economics, 2(1), 23–47.

Lee, H., & Choi, B. (2003). Knowledge management enablers, processes, and organizational performance: An integrative view and empirical examination. Journal of Management Information Systems, 20(1), 179–228.

Ma, H. (2000). Competitive advantage and firm performance. Competitiveness Review: An International Business Journal, 10(2), 15–32.

Mao, H., Liu, S., Zhang, J., & Deng, Z. (2016). Information technology resource, knowledge management capability, and competitive advantage: The moderating role of resource commitment. International Journal of Information Management, 36(6), 1062–1074.

Melville, N., Kraemer, K., & Gurbaxani, V. (2004). Information technology and organizational performance: An integrative model of IT business value. MIS Quarterly, 28(2), 283–322.

Mikes, A., & Kaplan, R. S. (2014). Towards a contingency theory of enterprise risk management. Working Paper 13-063, Harvard Business School. Retrieved from https://www.hbs.edu/ris/Publication%20Files/13-063_5e67dffe-aa5e-4fac-a746-7b3c07902520.pdf

Morgan, N. A., Kaleka, A., & Katsikeas, C. S. (2004). Antecedents of export venture performance: A theoretical model and empirical assessment. Journal of Marketing, 68(1), 90–108.

Otley, D. T. (1980). The contingency theory of management accounting: Achievement and prognosis. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 5(4), 413–428.

Phan, T., Dang, T., Nguyen, T., Ngo, T., & Hoang, T. (2020). The effect of enterprise risk management on firm value: Evidence from Vietnam industry listed enterprises. Accounting, 6(4), 473–480.

Ping, T. A., & Muthuveloo, R. (2015). The impact of enterprise risk management on firm performance: Evidence from Malaysia. Asian Social Science, 11(22), 149–159.

Podsakoff, P. M., & Organ, D. W. (1986). Self-reports in organizational research: Problems and prospects. Journal of Management, 12(4), 531–544.

Raduan, C., Jegak, U., Haslinda, A., & Alimin, I. (2009). Management, strategic management theories and the linkage with organizational competitive advantage from the resource-based view. European Journal of Social Sciences, 11(3), 402–418.

Raymond, L., Pare, G., & Bergeron, F. (1995). Matching information technology and organizational structure: An empirical study with implications for performance. European Journal of Information Systems, 4(1), 3–16.

Rom, A., & Rohde, C. (2007). Management Accounting and Integrated Information Systems: A Literature Review. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 8, 40–68.

Saeidi, P., Saeidi, S. P., Sofian, S., Saeidi, S. P., Nilashi, M., & Mardani, A. (2019). The impact of enterprise risk management on competitive advantage by moderating role of information technology. Computer Standards & Interfaces, 63, 67–82.

Saeidi, P., Sofian, S., & Rasid, S. Z. B. A. (2014). A proposed model of the relationship between enterprise risk management and firm performance. International Journal of Information Processing and Management, 5(2), 70–80.

Silva, J. R., Silva, A. F. D., & Chan, B. L. (2019). Enterprise risk management and firm value: Evidence from Brazil. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 55(3), 687–703.

Trịnh Thị Phan Lan. (2015). Các bằng chứng thực nghiệm về quản trị rủi ro tới giá trị doanh nghiệp. Tạp chí Khoa học ĐHQGHN: Kinh tế và Kinh doanh, 31(3), 1–9.

Venkatraman, N., & Ramanujam, V. (1986). Measurement of business performance in strategy research: A comparison of approaches. Academy of Management Review, 11(4), 801–814.

Wang, Y., & Lo, H. P. (2003). Customer‐focused performance and the dynamic model for competence building and leveraging. Journal of Management Development, 22(6), 483–526.

Wernerfelt, B. (1984). A resource‐based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 5(2),

171–180.

Wetzels, M., Odekerken-Schröder, G., & Van Oppen, C. (2009). Using PLS path modeling for assessing hierarchical construct models: Guidelines and empirical illustration. MIS Quarterly, 33(1), 177–195.