Quyền kiểm soát công ty mục tiêu và chênh lệch giá trong hoạt động mua lại và sáp nhập tại Việt Nam

Các tác giả

  • Hồ Hồng Hải Trường Đại học Ngoại thương Tác giả

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24311/jabes/2018.29.10.1327

Từ khóa:

Kiểm soát công ty, Chênh lệch giá trong M&A, M&A tại Việt Nam

Tóm tắt

Nghiên cứu này là một trong những những nghiên cứu đầu tiên ở Việt Nam đánh giá ảnh hưởng của động lực kiểm soát công ty đến chênh lệch giá trong giao dịch mua lại và sáp nhập (M&A) trên thị trường chứng khoán Việt Nam. Bằng việc sử dụng kết hợp phương pháp đánh giá tác động của một sự kiện và hồi quy bội trên cơ sở dữ liệu M&A tại Việt Nam trong giai đoạn 2007–2016, kết quả nghiên cứu cho thấy rằng hoạt động M&A tại Việt Nam được đặc trưng bởi động cơ chiếm quyền kiểm soát công ty mục tiêu hơn là động cơ đầu tư tài chính. Kết quả này phù hợp với lý thuyết về động lực kiểm soát thay vì lý thuyết về động lực đầu tư tài chính trong hoạt động mua lại doanh nghiệp.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Alsharairi, M., Black, E.L. and Hofer, C. (2016). The Impact of Pre-merger Earnings Management on Non-cash Acquisition Premia: Evidence from the European Market for Corporate Control. Corporate Ownership and Control. 12(4), 587–602.

Alexandridis, G., Fuller, K. P., Terhaar, L., & Travlos, N. G. (2013). Deal size, acquisition premia and shareholder gains. Journal of Corporate Finance, 20, 1–13.

Antràs, P. (2003). Firms, contracts, and trade structure. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118(4), 1375–1418.

Banz, R. W. (1981). The relationship between return and market value of common stocks. Journal of Financial Economics, 9(1), 3–18.

Basu, S. (1977). Investment performance of common stocks in relation to their price–earnings ratios: A test of the efficient market hypothesis. Journal of Finance, 32(3), 663–682

Berle, A., & Means, G. (1932). The Modern Corporation and Private Property. Harcourt, Brace & World, Inc.

Bhaumik, S. K., & Selarka, E. (2012). Does ownership concentration improve M&A outcomes in emerging markets?: Evidence from India. Journal of Corporate Finance, 18(4), 717–726.

Bộ Tài Chính. (2015). Thông tư số 155/2015/TT-BTC Hướng dẫn công bố thông tin trên thị trường chứng khoán. Truy cập từ https://thuvienphapluat.vn/van-ban/Chung-khoan/Thong-tu-155-2015-TT-BTC-cong-bo-thong-tin-tren-thi-truong-chung-khoan-2015-293015.aspx

Billett, M., & Ryngaert, M. (1997). Capital structure, asset structure and equity takeover premiums in cash tender offers. Journal of Corporate Finance, 3(2), 141–165

Bruner, R. F. (1988). The use of excess cash and debt capacity as a motive for merger. Journal of Financial & Quantitative Analysis, 23(2), 199–217.

Bulow, J., Ming, H., & Klemperer, P. (1999). Toeholds and takeovers. Journal of Political Economy, 107(3), 427–454.

Chari, A., Ouimet, P. P., & Tesar, L. L. (2004). Acquiring control in emerging markets: Evidence from the stock market (No. w10872). National Bureau of Economic Research.

Chính Phủ. (2015). Nghị Định số 91/2015/NĐ-CP về đầu tư vốn nhà nước vào doanh nghiệp và quản lý, sử dụng vốn, tài sản tại doanh nghiệp. Truy cập từ https://thuvienphapluat.vn/van-ban/Doanh-nghiep/Nghi-dinh-91-2015-ND-CP-dau-tu-von-nha-nuoc-vao-doanh-nghiep-292804.aspx

Collins, D. W., Rozeff, M. S., & Dhaliwal, D. S. (1981). The economic determinants of the market reaction to proposed mandatory accounting changes in the oil and gas industry. Journal of Accounting & Economics, 3(1), 37–71.

Damodaran, A. (2005). The Value of Control: Implications for Control Premia, Minority Discounts and Voting Share Differentials. NYU Journal Of Law & Business, 8, 487–503.

Demsetz, H., & Lehn, K. (1985). The structure of corporate ownership: Causes and consequences. Journal of Political Economy, 93(6), 1155–1178

Dewenter, K. L., & Malatesta, P. H. (2001). State–owned and privately - owned firms: An empirical analysis of profitability, leverage, and labor intensity. American Economic Review, 91(1), 320–334

Dionne, G., La Haye, M., & Bergerès, A. S. (2015). Does asymmetric information affect the premium in mergers and acquisitions?. Canadian Journal of Economics, 48(3), 819–852.

Dyck, A., & Zingales, L. (2004). Private Benefits of Control: An International Comparison. Journal of Finance, 59(2), 537–600.

Fama, E. F. (1970). Efficient capital markets: A review of theory and empirical work. Journal of Finance, 25(2), 383–417.

Fama, E. F., & French, K. R. (1992). The cross–section of expected stock returns. Journal of Finance, 47(2), 427–465

Guo, F., & Ma, S. (2015). Ownership characteristics and earnings management in China. Chinese Economy, 48(5), 372–395.

Fisman, R., & Svensson, J. (2007). Are corruption and taxation really harmful to growth? Firm level evidence. Journal of Development Economics, 83(1), 63–75.

Grossman, S. J., & Hart, O. D. (1980). Takeover bids, the free–rider problem, and the theory of the corporation. Bell Journal of Economics, 11(1), 42–64

Grossman, S. J., & Hart, O. D. (1986). The costs and benefits of ownership: A theory of vertical and lateral integration. Journal of Political Economy, 94(4), 691–719

Guidi, F., & Gupta, R. (2013). Market efficiency in the ASEAN region: Evidence from multivariate and cointegration tests. Applied Financial Economics, 23(4), 265–274.

Gujarati, D. (2010). Basic Econometrics (5Rev ed.). McGraw-Hill.

Halpern, P. (1983). Corporate acquisitions: A theory of special cases? A review of event studies applied to acquisitions. Journal of Finance, 38(2), 297–317.

Hart, O., & Moore, J. (2008). Contracts as reference points. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 123(1), 1–48.

Jackson, R., & Gart, A. (1999). Determinants and non–determinants of bank merger premiums. Mid–Atlantic Journal of Business, 35(4), 149–158

Jensen, M. C. (1986). Agency costs of free cash flow, corporate finance, and takeovers. American Economic Review, 76(2), 323–330

Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360

Jensen, M. C., & Ruback, R. S. (1983). The market for corporate control. Journal of Financial Economics, 11(1–4), 5–50

Jensen, R. (1982). Adoption and diffusion of an innovation of uncertain profitability. Journal of Economic Theory, 27(1), 182–194

Jory, S. R., Ngo, T. N., & Wang, D. (2016). Credit ratings and the premiums paid in mergers and acquisitions. Journal of Empirical Finance, 39, 93–104

Kaufman, D. (1988). Factors affecting the magnitude of premiums paid to target–firm shareholders in corporate acquisitions. The Financial Review, 23(4), 465–482.

La Porta, R., Lopez–de–Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1998). Law and finance. Journal of Political Economy, 106(6), 1113–1155

La Porta, R., Lopez-De-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (2000). Agency problems and dividend policies around the world. Journal of Finance, 55(1), 1–33.

Lakonishok, J., & Shapiro, A. C. (1984). Stock returns, beta, variance and size: An empirical analysis. Financial Analysts Journal, 40(4), 36–41

Lang, L. H. P., Stulz, R. M., & Walkling, R. A. (1989). Managerial performance, Tobin's Q, and the gains from successful tender offers. Journal of Financial Economics, 24(1), 137–154.

Martynova, M., & Renneboog, L. (2008). A century of corporate takeovers: What have we learned and where do we stand?. Journal of Banking & Finance, 32(10), 2148–2177.

M&A Vietnam 2017. (2017). Báo cáo thị trường M&A Việt Nam 2016–2017. Tìm bước đột phá. Truy cập từ http://maf.vn/hinhanh/tintuc/Bao%20cao%20M&A%202016-2017%20-%20Can%20mot%20cu%20hich%20moi%20.pdf

Peng, M., Bruton, G., Stan, C., & Huang, Y. (2016). Theories of the (state-owned) firm. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 33(2), 293–317.

Rand, J., & Tarp, F. (2012). Firm–level corruption in Vietnam. Economic Development & Cultural Change, 60(3), 571–595.

Rau, P. R., & Vermaelen, T. (1998). Glamour, value and the post-acquisition performance of acquiring firms. Journal of Financial Economics, 49(2), 223–253.

Schwert, G. W. (1996). Markup pricing in mergers and acquisitions. Journal of Financial Economics, 41(2), 153–192.

Servaes, H. (1991). Tobin's Q and gains from takeovers. Journal of Finance, 46(1), 409–419. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6261.1991.tb03758.x

Shawky, H. A., Kilb, T., & Staas, C. F. W. (1996). Determinants of bank merger premiums. Journal of Economics & Finance, 20(1), 117–133.

Shawver, T. J. (2002). Determinants of bank merger premiums. Bank Accounting & Finance, 15(6), 26–30.

Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1997). A survey of corporate governance. Journal of Finance, 52(2), 737–783.

Slusky, A. R., & Caves, R. E. (1991). Synergy, agency, and the determinants of premia paid in mergers. Journal of Industrial Economics, 39(3), 277–296.

Stulz, R. M. (1988). Managerial control of voting rights: Financing policies and the market for corporate control. Journal of Financial Economics, 20(1/2), 25–54.

Varaiya, N. P. (1987). Determinants of premiums in acquisition transactions. Managerial & Decision Economics, 8(3), 175–184.

Walkling, R. A., & Edmister, R. O. (1985). Determinants of tender offer premiums. Financial Analysts Journal, 41(1), 25–45.

Wickramanayake, J., & Wood, A. (2009). Determinants of acquisition premiums: Empirical evidence from mining industry in Australia and Canada. In EFMA Annual Meetings, Paper (No. 412).

World Bank. (2016). Report on The Observance of Standards and Codes. Retrieved from http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/220021512482581847/pdf/121901-ROSC-PUBLIC-FinalROSCEN.pdf

World Bank. (2018). Doing Business 2018: Reforming to create jobs – Vietnam. Retrieved from http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/608731510222788341/Doing-Business-2018-reforming-to-create-jobs-Vietnam

Lượt tải xuống

Đã Xuất bản

04.12.2018

Số

Chuyên mục

Bài nghiên cứu

Cách trích dẫn

Hồ Hồng Hải. (2018). Quyền kiểm soát công ty mục tiêu và chênh lệch giá trong hoạt động mua lại và sáp nhập tại Việt Nam. Tạp chí Nghiên cứu Kinh tế và Kinh doanh Châu Á, 29(10), 28-46. https://doi.org/10.24311/jabes/2018.29.10.1327