Sự trỗi dậy của Trung Quốc trong nền kinh tế toàn cầu và hệ quả đến các quốc gia ASEAN-6

Huy Huỳnh Thái

doi:10.24311/jabes/2018.29.3.1

Các tác giả

Huỳnh Thái Huy CERING Tác giả

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24311/jabes/2018.29.3.1

Từ khóa:

Mô hình kinh tế vĩ mô, Toàn cầu, GVAR, Liên kết thương mại, Chu kỳ kinh doanh quốc tế

Tóm tắt

Toàn cầu hóa cùng sự trỗi dậy của Trung Quốc trong ba thập kỷ qua đã làm thay đổi sâu sắc cấu trúc kinh tế thế giới. Các thay đổi trong liên kết thương mại giữa Trung Quốc, Mỹ cùng các quốc gia ASEAN-6 ảnh hưởng cơ chế truyền dẫn chu kỳ kinh doanh quốc tế đến ASEAN-6. Để đánh giá tác động, tác giả sử dụng mô hình GVAR với ba thiết lập tỷ trọng thương mại nhằm nắm bắt các thay đổi trong liên kết thương mại thế giới. Các kết quả chỉ ra rằng tác động dài hạn của cú sốc GDP Trung Quốc lên GDP ASEAN-6 (ngoại trừ Thái Lan) năm 2016 mạnh hơn so với cú sốc năm 2000. Đồng thời, tác động của cú sốc GDP Mỹ năm 2008 lên GDP ASEAN-6 (ngoại trừ Indonesia) thấp hơn so với năm 2000. Các phát hiện giúp giải thích vì sao các quốc gia khu vực ASEAN hồi phục nhanh chóng sau cuộc khủng hoảng tài chính toàn cầu năm 2008

Tài liệu tham khảo

Ahuja, A., & Myrvoda, A. (2012). The spillover effects of a downturn in China’s real estate investment. IMF Working Paper, No. 12/266.

Ahuja, A., & Nabar, M. (2012). Investment-led growth in China: Global spillovers. IMF Working Paper, No. 12/267.

Andrews, D. W. K., & Ploberger, W. (1994). Optimal tests when a nuisance parameter is present only under the alternative. Econometrica, 62(6), 1383–1414.

ASEAN. (2017a). ASEAN statistical yearbook. Retrieved from http://aseanstats.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/ASYB_2017-rev.pdf

ASEAN. (2017b). ASEAN economic community chartbook. Retrieved from http://asean.org /storage/2018/01/42.-November-2017-ASEAN-Economic-Community-AEC-Chartbook-2017.pdf

Aslam, M. (2012). The impact of ASEAN-China free trade area agreement on ASEAN’s manufacturing industry. International Impact of China Studies, 3(1), 43–78.

Bussière, M., Chudik, A., & Sestieri, G. (2012). Globalization and Monetary Policy Institute Working Paper 119, Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas.

Cashin, P., Mohaddes, K., & Raissi, M. (2012). The global impact of the systemic economies and MENA business cycles. IMF Working Papers, WP/12/255.

Cashin, P., Mohaddes, K., & Raissi, M. (2016). China’s slowdown and global financial market volatility: Is world growth losing out?. IMF Working Papers, WP/16/63.

Cesa-Bianchi, A., Pesaran, M. H., Rebucci, A., & Xu, T. (2012). China’s emergence in the world economy and business cycles in Latin America. Economia Journal of the LACEA, 12, 1–75.

Dees, S., Di Mauro, F., Pesaran, M. H., & Smith, L. V. (2007). Exploring the international linkages of the Euro area: A global VAR analysis. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 22(1), 1–38.

Dizioli, A., Hunt, B., & Maliszewski, W. (2016). Spillovers from the maturing of China’s economy. IMF Working Paper, WP/16/212.

Dungey, M., & Vehbi, T. (2015). The influences of international output shocks from the US and China on ASEAN economies. Journal of Asian Economics, 39, 59–71.

Duval, R., Cheng, K., Oh, K. H., & Saraf, R. (2014). Trade integration and business cycle synchronization: A reappraisal with focus on Asia. IMF Working Paper, WP/14/52.

Hansen, B. (1992). Efficient estimation and testing of cointegrating vectors in the presence of deterministic trends. Journal of Econometrics, 53(1–3), 87–121.

Harbo, I., Johansen, S., Nielsen, B., & Rahbek, A. (1998). Asymptotic inference on cointegrating rank in partial systems. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 16(4), 388–399.

Hendry, D. F., & Mizon, G. (1998). Exogeneity, causality, and co-breaking in economic policy analysis of a small econometric model of money in the UK. Empirical Economics, 3(23), 267–294.

IMF. (2014a). World economic outlook: Recovery strengthens, remains uneven. Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund.

IMF. (2014b). IMF multilateral policy issues report: 2014 spillover report. IMF Policy Paper, International Monetary Fund, Washington, DC.

IMF. (2017). World economic outlook, October 2017: Seeking sustainable growth short-term recovery, long-term challenges. Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund

IMF. (2018). Direction of trade statistics. Retrieved on 10th February 2018, from http:// data.imf.org/?sk=9D6028D4-F14A-464C-A2F2-59B2CD424B85

Inoue, T., Kaya, D., & Ohshige, H. (2015). The impact of China’s slowdown on the Asia Pacific region: An application of the GVAR model. Policy Research Working Paper 7442, The World Bank.

Johansen, S. (1992). Cointegration in partial systems and the efficiency of single-equation analysis. Journal of Econometrics, 52(3), 389–402.

Lee, H. A., & Ofreneo, R. (2014). From Asian to global financial crisis: Recovery amidst expanding labour precarity. Journal of Contemporary Asia, 44(4), 688–710.

Nyblom, J. (1989). Testing for the constancy of parameters over time. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 84(405), 223–230.

Oehler-Sincai, I. M. (2010). China’s role at global and regional levels from the perspective of trade and FDI flows. Journal of Global Economic, 2(1), 27–47.

Osorio, C., & Unsal, F. (2013). Inflation dynamics in Asia: Causes, changes, and spillovers from China. Journal of Asian Economics, 24, 26–40.

Paladini, S., & Cheng, J. Y. (2015). The ASEAN-China Free Trade Area–A success or a failure? A preliminary evaluation based on econometric evidence. Journal of Comparative Asian Development, 14(2), 171–199.

Park, D., Park, I., & Estrada, G. (2009). Prospects for ASEAN-People’s Republic of China Free Trade Area: A Qualitative and Quantitative Analysis. China and the World Economy, 117(4), 104–120.

Park, H., & Fuller, W. (1995). Alternative estimators and unit root tests for the autoregressive process. Journal of Time Series Analysis, 16(4), 415–429.

Pesaran, H. M., & Shin, Y. (1998). Generalized impulse response analysis in linear

multivariate models. Economics Letters, 58(1), 17–29.

Pesaran, M. H., Schuermann, T., & Weiner, S. (2004). Modeling regional interdependencies using a global error-correcting macroeconometric model. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 22, 129–162.

Pesaran, M. H., Shin, Y., & Smith, R. J. (2000). Structural analysis of vector error correction models with exogenous I(1) variables. Journal of Econometrics, 97(2), 293–343.

Ploberger, W., & Krämer, W. (1992). The CUSUM test with OLS residuals. Econometrica, 60(2), 271–285.

Quandt, R. E. (1960). Tests of the hypothesis that a linear regression system obeys two separate regimes. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 55(290), 324–330.

Rafiq, S. (2016). When China sneezes does ASEAN catch a cold? IMF Working Paper, WP/16/214.

Sato, K., Zhang, Z., & McAleer, M. (2011). Identifying shocks in regionally integrated East Asian economies with structural VAR and block exogeneity. Mathematics and Computers in Simulation, 81, 1353–1364.

Sims, C. A. (1986). Are forecasting models usable for policy analysis?. Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis, Quarterly Review, 10(1), 2–16.

Smith, L., & Galesi, A. (2014). GVAR Toolbox 2.0. University of Cambridge: Judge Business School.

Sznajderska, A. (2017). The role of China in the world economy: Evidence from global VAR model. NBP Working Paper No. 270, Narodowy Bank Polski.

UNCTAD. (2017). World investment reports - Investment and the digital economy. Geneva: United Nations Conference on Trade and Development.

Waal, A. D., & Eyden, R. V. (2016). The impact of economic shocks in the rest of the world on South Africa: Evidence from a global VAR. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 52(3), 557–573.

World Bank Indicator. (2018). GDP, PPP (current international $). Retrieved on 10th February 2018, from https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.MKTP.PP.CD

World Bank. (2015). Global economic prospects, January 2015: Having fiscal space and using it. Washington, DC: World Bank.

WTO. (2017). World trade statistics review. Geneva: World Trade Organization.

Zhang, L. (2016). Rebalancing in China–Progress and prospects. IMF Working Paper, WP/16/183.