Trách nhiệm xã hội doanh nghiệp: Vai trò điều tiết hoạt động kiểm soát nội bộ ở các doanh nghiệp tại Việt Nam
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24311/jabes/2019.30.7.1160Abstract
Dựa trên lý thuyết hợp pháp và lý thuyết cơ sở nguồn lực doanh nghiệp, nghiên cứu này xây dựng và kiểm định một mô hình trung gian – điều tiết về quá trình hệ thống kiểm soát nội bộ tác động đến kết quả hoạt động kinh doanh trong bối cảnh trách nhiệm xã hội doanh nghiệp ngày càng được quan tâm bởi các doanh nghiệp tại Việt Nam. Kết quả kiểm định từ dữ liệu khảo sát 169 doanh nghiệp tại Việt Nam cho thấy cấu trúc kiểm soát nội bộ tác động đến kết quả hoạt động kinh doanh thông qua việc tăng cường sự hữu hiệu của kiểm soát nội bộ. Kết quả nghiên cứu cũng cho thấy trách nhiệm xã hội doanh nghiệp đóng vai trò điều tiết cho mối quan hệ giữa cấu trúc kiểm soát nội bộ và sự hữu hiệu của kiểm soát nội bộ. Nghiên cứu này đem lại một số hàm ý lý thuyết và hàm ý quản lý cho các nhà quản trị doanh nghiệp tại Việt Nam để tổ chức hệ thống kiểm soát nội bộ hữu hiệu và xây dựng cơ chế trách nhiệm xã hội nhằm nâng cao lợi thế cạnh tranh.
References
Adams, C. A., Potter, B., Singh, P. J., & York, J. (2016). Exploring the implications of integrated reporting for social investment (disclosures). The British Accounting Review, 48(3), 283–296.
Aiken, L. S., West, S. G., & Reno, R. R. (1991). Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Alexander, D., Tiron-Tudor, A., & Dragu, I. (2018). Implications of corporate accountability on civil society: The case of Rosia Montana Gold Corporation (RMGC). Meditari Accountancy Research, 26(1), 145–169.
Armstrong, J. S., & Overton, T. S. (1977). Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys. Journal of Marketing Research, 14(3), 396–402.
Ashbaugh-Skaife, H., Collins, D. W., & Kinney Jr, W. R. (2007). The discovery and reporting of internal control deficiencies prior to SOX-mandated audits. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 44(1–2), 166–192.
Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120.
Chen, Y., Smith, A. L., Cao, J., & Xia, W. (2014). Information technology capability, internal control effectiveness, and audit fees and delays. Journal of Information Systems, 28(2), 149–180.
Cheng, Q., Goh, B. W., & Kim, J. B. (2018). Internal control and operational efficiency. Contemporary Accounting Research, 35(2), 1102–1139.
COSO. (2013). Internal Control–Integrated Framework. New York, NY: COSO. Retrieved from http://www.coso.org
Deegan, C. (2002). Introduction: The legitimising effect of social and environmental disclosures–A theoretical foundation. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 15(3), 282–311.
Deegan, C. (2009). Financial Accounting Theory. North Ryde: McGraw‐Hill.
Deegan, C. (2014). An overview of legitimacy theory as applied within the social and environmental accounting literature. In J. Bebbington, J. Unerman, & B. O’Dwyer (Eds.), Sustainability Accounting and Accountability (2nd ed., pp. 248-272). Abbingdon: Routledge.
Deegan, C., Rankin, M., & Tobin, J. (2002). An examination of the corporate social and environmental disclosures of BHP from 1983–1997: A test of legitimacy theory. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 15(3), 312–343.
Fornell, C. (1992). A national customer satisfaction barometer: The Swedish experience. Journal of Marketing, 56(1), 6–21.
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: Algebra and statistics. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(3), 382–388.
Gao, X., & Jia, Y. (2016). Internal control over financial reporting and the safeguarding of corporate resources: Evidence from the value of cash holdings. Contemporary Accounting Research, 33(2), 783–814.
Gray, R., Kouhy, R., & Lavers, S. (1995). Corporate social and environmental reporting: a review of the literature and a longitudinal study of UK disclosure. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 8(2), 47–77.
Guthrie, J., & Parker, L. D. (1989). Corporate social reporting: A rebuttal of legitimacy theory. Accounting and Business Research, 19(76), 343–352.
Henseler, J., Hubona, G., & Ray, P. A. (2016). Using PLS path modeling in new technology research: Updated guidelines. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 116(1), 2–20.
Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115–135.
Hoque, Z., Covaleski, M. A., & Gooneratne, T. N. (2013). Theoretical triangulation and pluralism in research methods in organizational and accounting research. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 26(7), 1170–1198.
Hunziker, S. (2017). Efficiency of internal control: Evidence from Swiss non-financial companies. Journal of Management & Governance, 21(2), 399–433.
Johnstone, K., Li, C., & Rupley, K. H. (2011). Changes in corporate governance associated with the revelation of internal control material weaknesses and their subsequent remediation. Contemporary Accounting Research, 28(1), 331–383.
Jokipii, A. (2010). Determinants and consequences of internal control in firms: A contingency theory based analysis. Journal of Management & Governance, 14(2), 115–144.
Joseph, F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (1992). Multivariate Data Analysis: With Readings. New York, US: Macmillan Publishing Company.
Joshi, S., & Li, Y. (2016). What is corporate sustainability and how do firms practice it? A management accounting research perspective. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 28(2), 1–11.
Khlif, H., Samaha, K., & Soliman, M. (2019). Internal control quality, voluntary disclosure, and cost of equity capital: The case of an unregulated market. International Journal of Auditing, 23(1), 144–160.
Kim, Y. S., Kim, Y., & Kim, H. D. (2017). Corporate social responsibility and internal control effectiveness. Asia‐Pacific Journal of Financial Studies, 46(2), 341–372.
Li, X., Zheng, C., Liu, G., & Sial, M. (2018). The effectiveness of internal control and corporate social responsibility: Evidence from Chinese capital market. Sustainability, 10(11), 4006. doi: 10.3390/su10114006
Lindell, M. K., & Whitney, D. J. (2001). Accounting for common method variance in cross-sectional research designs. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(1), 114–121.
Liu, C., Lin, B., & Shu, W. (2017). Employee quality, monitoring environment and internal control. China Journal of Accounting Research, 10(1), 51–70.
Liu, Q., Luo, L., He, W., & Chen, H. (2012). State ownership, the institutional environment, and internal control quality: Evidence from Chinese listed firms. Accounting Research, 3, 52–61.
Lopez, T. J., Vandervelde, S. D., & Wu, Y.-J. (2009). Investor perceptions of an auditor’s adverse internal control opinion. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 28(3), 231–250.
Mintz, O., & Currim, I. S. (2013). What drives managerial use of marketing and financial metrics and does metric use affect performance of marketing-mix activities?. Journal of Marketing, 77(2),
17–40.
Mobus, J. L. (2005). Mandatory environmental disclosures in a legitimacy theory context. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 18(4), 492–517.
Morgan, N. A., & Piercy, N. F. (1998). Interactions between marketing and quality at the SBU level: Influences and outcomes. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 26(3), 190–208.
Nguyen, M., Bensemann, J., & Kelly, S. (2018). Corporate social responsibility (CSR) in Vietnam: A conceptual framework. International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility, 3(1), 1–12.
Nguyen, N. P. (2018). Performance implication of market orientation and use of management accounting systems: The moderating role of accountants’ participation in strategic decision making. Journal of Asian Business and Economic Studies, 25(1), 33–49.
Nguyễn Phong Nguyên, & Đoàn Ngọc Quế. (2016). Tác động của định hướng thị trường và áp lực cạnh tranh đến mức độ sử dụng thông tin kế toán quản trị nhằm nâng cao kết quả hoạt động kinh doanh ở các doanh nghiệp Việt Nam. Tạp chí Phát triển kinh tế, 27(11), 98–123.
Nguyen, T. T., & Bui, N. T. (2018). Solutions to strengthen the internal control system in paper manufacturing enterprises. Journal of Advances in Economics and Finance, 3(3), 71–87.
Nguyen, T., Locke, S., & Reddy, K. (2015). Ownership concentration and corporate performance from a dynamic perspective: Does national governance quality matter?. International Review of Financial Analysis, 41, 148–161.
O’Donovan, G. (2002). Environmental disclosures in the annual report: Extending the applicability and predictive power of legitimacy theory. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 15(3), 344–371.
Ouakouak, M. L., & Ouedraogo, N. (2017). Antecedents of employee creativity and organisational innovation: An empirical study. International Journal of Innovation Management, 21(07), 1750060.
Patten, D. M. (1992). Intra-industry environmental disclosures in response to the Alaskan oil spill: A note on legitimacy theory. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 17(5), 471–475.
Pfister, J., & Hartmann, F. (2011). Managing organizational culture for effective internal control: From practice to theory. Accounting Review, 86(2), 738–741.
Porter, M. E. (2008). On Competition (Updated and Expanded ed.). Boston: Harvard Business School Publishing.
Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2004). SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36(4),
717–731.
PwC. (2018). Doing Business in Vietnam. Retrieved from https://www.pwc.com/vn/en/ publications/vietnam-publications/dbg-2018.html
Scapens, R. W. (1994). Never mind the gap: Towards an institutional perspective on management accounting practice. Management Accounting Research, 5(3-4), 301–321.
Shu, W., Chen, Y., & Lin, B. (2018). Does corporate integrity improve the quality of internal control?. China Journal of Accounting Research, 11(4), 407–427.
Stokes, Y., Vandyk, A., Squires, J., Jacob, J.-D., & Gifford, W. (2019). Using Facebook and LinkedIn to recruit nurses for an online survey. Western Journal of Nursing Research, 41(1), 96–110.
Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 571–610.
Tabachnick, B. G., Fidell, L. S., & Osterlind, S. J. (2001). Using Multivariate Statistics. New York, US: Harper.
van der Stede, W. A. (2014). A manipulationist view of causality in cross-sectional survey research. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 39(7), 567–574.
Wilmshurst, T. D., & Frost, G. R. (2000). Corporate environmental reporting: A test of legitimacy theory. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 13(1), 10–26.
Wu, L. –Z., Kwan, H. K., Yim, F. H.-K., Chiu, R. K., & He, X. (2015). CEO ethical leadership and corporate social responsibility: A moderated mediation model. Journal of Business Ethics, 130(4), 819–831.
Xuan-Quang, D., & Zhong-Xin, W. (2013). Impact of ownership structure and corporate governance on capital structure: The case of Vietnamese firms. Australian Journal of Business and Management Research, 3(3), 11–19.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 JOURNAL OF ASIAN BUSINESS AND ECONOMIC STUDIES
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
