Chất lượng thể chế và lựa chọn địa điểm đầu tư của các doanh nghiệp đa quốc gia – Bằng chứng tại Việt Nam

Authors

  • Linh Huỳnh Thị Diệu Trường Đại học Kinh tế, Đại học Đà Nẵng Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24311/jabes/2022.33.09.03

Keywords:

Institutional quality, Investment location, Multinational company, Foreign direct investment, Vietnam

Abstract

The article assesses the influence of Vietnam’s institutional quality on the decision to choose our country as the investment location of multinational companies (MNCs) from 18 main investment partners over the 2013–2020 period. Institutional quality is measured through the World Bank's Worldwide Governance Indicators. Based on the augmented Gravity Model and Random effect regression method, the estimated results confirm the importance of the institutional environment affecting the decision to choose Vietnam as an investment location for MNCs, as 5/6 of the institutional quality indicators have significant influences. Specifically, while Control of Corruption, Political Stability and Regulatory Quality have a positive impact on attracting foreign direct investment into Vietnam, contrary to expectations when Government Effectiveness and Rule of Law have negative impacts on attracting this capital.

References

Araújo, B. C., & Salerno, M. S. (2015). Technological strategies and learning-by-exporting: The case of Brazilian manufacturing firms, 2006–2008. International Business Review, 24(5), 725–738.

Awadhi, M., James, M., & Byaro, M. (2022). Does institutional development attract foreign direct investments in Sub-Saharan Africa? A dynamic panel analysis. African Journal of Economic Review, 10(1), 117–129.

Baier, F. J. (2019). Foreign direct investment and tax: OECD gravity modelling in a world with International Financial Institutions. EIIW Discussion Paper 261. Germany: University of Wuppertal.

Bayar, Y., & Alakbarov, N. (2016). Corruption and foreign direct investment inflows in emerging market economies. Ecoforum Journal, 5(2).

Dunning, J. H. (1980). Toward an eclectic theory of international production: Some empirical tests. Journal of International Business Studies, 11(1), 9–31.

Fan, Z., Zhang, R., Liu, X., & Pan, L. (2016). China’s outward FDI efficiency along the Belt and Road: An application of stochastic frontier gravity model. China Agricultural Economic Review, 8(3), 455–479.

Hoàng Thanh Hiền. (2021). Tác động của hoạt động xuất khẩu đến năng suất các nhân tố tổng hợp (TFP): Bằng chứng từ doanh nghiệp tại Việt Nam. Tạp chí Kinh tế và Phát triển, 289, 74–82.

Jadhav, P., & Katti, V. (2012). Institutional and political determinants of foreign direct investment: Evidence from BRICS economies. Poverty & Public Policy, 4(3), 49–57.

Kaufmann, D., Kraay, A., & Mastruzzi, M. (2011). The worldwide governance indicators: Methodology and analytical issues. Hague Journal on the Rule of Law, 3(2), 220–246.

Kaufmann, D., Kraay, A., & Zoido-Lobatón, P. (1999). Aggregating governance indicators. Policy Research Working Paper No. 2195. Retrieved from The World Bank: http://info.worldbank.org/governance/wgi/pdf/govind.pdf

Khushnood, E., Channa, Z. H., Bhutto, M., & Erri, M. A. (2020). Impact of good governance indicators on the inflow of foreign direct investment (FDI) in Pakistan. NICE Research Journal of Social Science, 13(2), 69–83.

Kolstad, I., & Wiig, A. (2012). What determines Chinese outward FDI?. Journal of World Business, 47(1), 26–34.

Nguyen Huu Cung. (2019). Gross domestic product and foreign direct investment: Empirical evidence from Vietnam. European Scientific Journal, 15(31), 38–51.

North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Saidi, Y., Ochi, A., & Ghadri, H. (2013). Governance and FDI attractiveness: Some evidence from developing and developed countries. Global Journal of Management and Business Research, 13(6), 15–24.

Seth, B. (2018). Governance institutions and FDI: An empirical study of top 30 FDI recipient countries. International Journal of Humanities & Applied Social Sciences (IJHASS), 2(1), 1–10.

Shah, M. H., & Afridi, A. G. (2015). Significance of good governance for FDI inflows in SAARC countries. Business & Economic Review, 7(2), 31–52.

Taylor, M. S. (2004). Unbundling the pollution haven hypothesis. Advances in Economic Analysis & Policy, 4(2), 2–28.

Ullah, I., & Khan, M. A. (2017). Institutional quality and foreign direct investment inflows: Evidence from Asian countries. Journal of Economic Studies, 44(6), 1030–1050.

Vo Xuan Vinh. (2018). Determinants of capital flows to emerging economies – Evidence from Vietnam. Finance Research Letters, 27(C), 23–27.

Wooldridge, J. M. (2002). Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data. Cambridge, Massachusetts, London: MIT Press.

Wooldridge, J. M. (2009). Introductory Econometrics: A Modern Approach. USA: South-Western CENGAGE Learning.

Yeboua, K. (2021). Foreign direct investment and economic growth in Africa: New empirical approach on the role of institutional development. Journal of African Business, 22(3), 361–378.

Published

2022-06-27

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Huỳnh Thị Diệu , L. (2022). Chất lượng thể chế và lựa chọn địa điểm đầu tư của các doanh nghiệp đa quốc gia – Bằng chứng tại Việt Nam. JOURNAL OF ASIAN BUSINESS AND ECONOMIC STUDIES, 33(9), 36-50. https://doi.org/10.24311/jabes/2022.33.09.03