Vai trò của quản trị công ty đối với hiệu quả hoạt động doanh nghiệp: Bằng chứng thực nghiệm từ cách tiếp cận tập mờ tại Việt Nam
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24311/jabes/2026.37.04.7Keywords:
Việt Nam, fsQCA, Hiệu quả hoạt động, Chỉ số quản trị công tyAbstract
As Vietnam’s stock market has expanded rapidly in both size and investor participation, improving the quality of corporate governance among listed firms has become increasingly necessary. This study examines the relationship between the corporate governance index (CGI) and firm performance using fuzzy-set Qualitative Comparative Analysis (fsQCA), aiming to identify multiple combinations of conditions associated with high performance. The CGI is developed from board characteristics and oversight mechanisms, based on data from 179 non-financial firms listed in Vietnam over the period 2017-2024. The findings indicate that several alternative governance configurations can lead to strong firm performance, measured by Tobin’s Q, ROA, and ROE. In many of these configurations, the CGI emerges as a key condition. These findings suggest that corporate governance should be understood as a system of interrelated conditions that operate alongside firm characteristics, leverage, and the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, rather than as isolated mechanisms influencing performance independently. By applying fsQCA in an emerging market context, this study provides methodological value to corporate governance research and offers practical implications for managers, investors, and policymakers in Vietnam.
References
Arora, A., & Bodhanwala, S. (2018). Relationship between corporate governance index and firm performance: Indian evidence. Global Business Review, 19, 675-689.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0972150917713812
Bhatt, P. R., & Bhatt, R. R. (2017). Corporate governance and firm performance in Malaysia. Corporate Governance, 17(5), 896-912. https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-03-2016-0054
Buallay, A., Hamdan, A., & Zureigat, Q. (2017). Corporate governance and firm performance: Evidence from Saudi Arabia. Australasian Accounting, Business and Finance Journal, 11(1), 78-98. https://doi.org/10.14453/aabfj.v11i1.6
Bộ Tài chính. (2017). Thông tư số 95/2017/TT-BTC hướng dẫn một số điều chỉnh của Nghị định số 71/2017/NĐ-CP ngày 06/6/2017 của Chính phủ hướng dẫn về quản trị công ty áp dụng đối với công ty đại chúng, ban hành ngày 22/9/2017. Truy cập từ https://thuvienphapluat.vn/van-ban/Doanh-nghiep/Thong-tu-95-2017-TT-BTC-huong-dan-Nghi-dinh-71-2017-ND-CP-ve-quan-tri-cong-ty-339588.aspx
Bộ Tài chính. (2020). Thông tư số 166/2020/TT-BTC hướng dẫn một số điều về quản trị công ty áp dụng đối với công ty đại chúng tại Nghị định số 155/2020/NĐ0CP ngày 31 tháng 12 năm 2020 của Chính phủ quy định chi tiết thi hành một số điều của Luật chứng khoán, ban hành ngày 31/12/2020. Truy cập từ https://thuvienphapluat.vn/van-ban/Doanh-nghiep/Thong-tu-116-2020-TT-BTC-huong-dan-Nghi-dinh-155-2020-ND-CP-quan-tri-cong-ty-dai-chung-463922.aspx
Ciftci, I., Tatoglu, E., Wood, G., Demirbag, M., & Zaim, S. (2019). Corporate governance and firm performance in emerging markets: Evidence from Turkey. International Business Review, 28(1), 90-103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2018.08.004
Chu Thị Thu Thuỷ. (2020). Tác động của đặc trưng hội đồng quản trị đến hiệu quả tài chính của các công ty cổ phần niêm yết trên thị trường chứng khoán Việt Nam. Tạp chí Nghiên cứu Kinh tế và Kinh doanh Châu Á, 31(3), 43-60.
Conyon, M. J., & He, L. (2017). Firm performance and boardroom gender diversity: A quantile regression approach. Journal of Business Research, 79, 198-211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.02.006
Dahlquist, M., Pinkowitz, L., Stulz, R. M., & Williamson, R. (2003). Corporate governance and the home bias. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 38(1), 87-110. https://doi.org/10.2307/4126765
Do Thi Hai Yen, Tran Thi Thu, & Le Thi My Hanh. (2024). The effects of foreign ownership on corporate risk: Findings from quantile regression and FSQCA. International Journal of Business and Society, 25(2), 573-591. https://doi.org/10.33736/ijbs.7618.2024
Eng, S., & Woodside, A. G. (2012). Configural analysis of the drinking man: Fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analyses. Addiction Behaviour, 37(4), 541-543. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2011.11.034
Fiss, P. C. (2007). A set-theoretic approach to organizational configurations. The Academy of Management Review, 32(4), 1180-1198. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20159362
García Martín, C. J., & Herrero, B. (2018). Boards of directors: Composition and effects on the performance of the firm. Economic Research Ekonomskaistrazivanja, 31(1), 1015-1041. https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2018.1436454
Gompers, P. A., Ishii, J. L., & Metrick, A. (2003). Corporate governance and equity prices. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118(1), 107-156. http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/00335530360535162
Green, C. P., & Homroy, S. (2018). Female directors, board committees and firm performance. European Economic Review, 102, 19-38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2017.12.003
Gupta, P., & Sharma, A. M. (2014). A study of the impact of corporate governance practices on firm performance in Indian and South Korean companies. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 133, 4-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.04.163
Hà Phước Vũ, & Nguyễn Thị Thanh Bình. (2025). Hiệu quả tài chính của doanh nghiệp dưới góc nhìn “kinh nghiệm vừa đủ” của Giám đốc điều hành - Bằng chứng từ Thị trường mới nổi Việt Nam. Tạp chí Nghiên cứu Kinh tế và Kinh doanh Châu Á, 36(7), 70-86. https://doi.org/10.24311/jabes/2025.36.7.05
Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behaviour, agency costs, and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305-360. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X
Ha, T. X., & Tran, T. T. (2022). The impact of product market competition on firm performance through the mediating of corporate governance index: empirical of listed companies in Vietnam. Cogent Business & Management, 9(1), 2129356. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2022.2129356
Gujarati, D. N. (2004). Basic Econometrics (4th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill Companies.
Khanchel, I. (2007). Corporate governance: measurement and determinant analysis. Managerial Auditing Journal, 22(8), 740-760. https://doi.org/10.1108/02686900710819625
Merendino, A., & Melville, R. (2019). The board of directors and firm performance: empirical evidence from listed companies. Corporate Governance, 19(3), 508-551. https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-06-2018-0211
Nepal, M., & Deb, R. (2022). Board characteristics and firm performance: Indian textiles sector panorama. Management and Labour Studies, 47(1), 74-96. https://doi.org/10.1177/0258042X211026148
Nguyen, T. T. M., Evans, E., & Lu, M. (2017). Independent directors, ownership concentration and firm performance in listed companies: Evidence from Vietnam. Pacific Accounting Review, 29(2), 204-226. https://doi.org/10.1108/PAR-07-2016-0070
OECD. (2004). OECD Principles of Corporate Governance 2004. Retrieved from https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/oecd-principles-of-corporate-governance-2004_9789264015999-en.html
Pillai, R., & Al-Malkawi, H. A. N. (2018). On the relationship between corporate governance and firm performance: Evidence from GCC countries. Research in International Business and Finance, 44, 394-410. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2017.07.110
Saidat, Z., Silva, M., & Seaman, C. (2019). The relationship between corporate governance and financial performance: Evidence from Jordanian family and nonfamily firms. Journal of Family Business Management, 9(1), 54-78. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFBM-11-2017-0036
Schneider, C. Q., & Wagemann, C. (2012). Set-Theoretic Methods for the Social Sciences: A Guide to Qualitative Comparative Analysis. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139004244
Sekaran, U. (2003). Research Methods for Business: A Skill-Building Approach (4th ed.). John Wiley & Sons.
Singareddy, R. R., Chandrasekaran, S., Annamalai, B., & Ranjan, P. (2018). Corporate governance data of 6 Asian economies (2010-2017). Data in Brief, 20, 53-56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2018.07.048
Võ Hồng Đức, & Phan Bùi Gia Thủy. (2013). Quản trị công ty & hiệu quả hoạt động doanh nghiệp: Minh chứng từ các công ty niêm yết trên Sở giao dịch Chứng khoán TP.HCM. Tạp chí Phát triển kinh tế, 275, 01-15.
Xia, J., Zhang, L., & Song, Y. (2024). The impact of environmental regulatory instruments on agribusiness technology innovation–A study of configuration effects based on fsQCA. PLoS One, 19(1). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0294662
Xu, J. & Jin, Z. (2022). Exploring the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on firms’ financial performance and cash holding: New evidence from China’s agri-food sector. Agronomy, 12(8), 1951. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12081951
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 JOURNAL OF ASIAN BUSINESS AND ECONOMIC STUDIES
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
