Các nhân tố tác động đến hành vi đổi mới sáng tạo của giảng viên đại học tại Việt Nam
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24311/jabes/2023.34.1.1Keywords:
Innovative work behavior, Self-efficacy, Culture of openness and learning, Perceived social impactAbstract
Innovation in education plays an important role in meeting the needs of changing workforce. This study presents a systematic framework to analyze the effect of self-efficacy, culture of openness and learning, and perceived social impact on lecturers’ innovative work behavior at universities in Vietnam. Using a sample of 471 lecturers, the research results show that self-efficacy, culture of openness and learning, perceived social impact have positive impacts on innovative work behavior. The results help universities respond to changing environments more effectively, offering administrative implications to foster innovation. In addition, this research has contributed to the model of innovation.
References
Aboobaker, N., & Zakkariya, K. A. (2021). Digital learning orientation and innovative behavior in the higher education sector: Effects of organizational learning culture and readiness for change. International Journal of Educational Management, 35(5), 1030–1047.
AlEssa, H. S., & Durugbo, C. M. (2021). Systematic review of innovative work behavior concepts and contributions. Management Review Quarterly, 72(4), 1171–1208.
Alessandri, G., Caprara, G. V., Eisenberg, N., & Steca, P. (2009). Reciprocal relations among self-efficacy beliefs and prosociality across time. Journal of Personality, 77(4), 1229–1259.
Amabile, T. M. (1988). A model of creativity and innovation in organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 10(1), 123–167.
Amabile, T. M., & Pratt, M. G. (2016). The dynamic componential model of creativity and innovation in organizations: Making progress, making meaning. Research in Organizational Behavior, 36, 157–183.
Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191–215.
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The Exercise of Control. New York: Freeman.
Bastedo, M. N., Altbach, P. G., & Gumport, P. J. (2016). American Higher Education in the Twenty-First Century: Social, Political, and Economic Challenges. JHU Press.
Bawuro, F. A., Shamsuddin, A., Wahab, E., & Chidozie, C. C. (2019). Prosocial motivation and innovative behaviour: An empirical analysis of selected public university lecturers in Nigeria. International Journal of Scientific and Technology Research, 8(9), 1187–1194.
Caliskan, A., & Zhu, C. (2020). Organizational culture and educational innovations in Turkish higher education: Perceptions and reactions of students. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 20(1), 20–39.
Cangialosi, N., Battistelli, A., & Odoardi, C. (2021). Designing innovative jobs: A fuzzy-set configurational analysis of job characteristics. Personnel Review (ahead-of-print). doi: 10.1108/PR-02-2021-0105
Carmeli, A., & Schaubroeck, J. (2007). The influence of leaders’ and other referents’ normative expectations on individual involvement in creative work. The Leadership Quarterly, 18(1),
35–48.
De Jong, J., & Den Hartog, D. (2010). Measuring innovative work behaviour. Creativity and Innovation Management, 19(1), 23–36.
Duyar, I., Ras, N., & Pearson, C. L. (2015). Analysis of teachers’ task and extra-role performance under different autonomy regimes. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 64(4), 499–522.
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error: Algebra and Statistics. Sage Publications.
Grant, A. M. (2007). Relational job design and the motivation to make a prosocial difference. Academy of Management Review, 32(2), 393–417.
Grant, A. M. (2008). The significance of task significance: Job performance effects, relational mechanisms, and boundary conditions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(1), 108–124.
Grant, A. M., & Campbell, E. M. (2007). Doing good, doing harm, being well and burning out: The interactions of perceived prosocial and antisocial impact in service work. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 80(4), 665–691.
Hackman, J. R., & Oldham, G. R. (1976). Motivation through the design of work: Test of a theory. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 16(2), 250–279.
Hair Jr, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., Sarstedt, M., Danks, N. P., & Ray, S. (2022). Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) Using R: A Workbook. Springer Nature.
Hair Jr, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2021). A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). Sage Publications.
Hon, A. H. Y., & Leung, A. S. M. (2011). Employee creativity and motivation in the Chinese context: The moderating role of organizational culture. Cornell Hospitality Quarterly, 52(2), 125–134.
Hon, A. H. Y., & Lui, S. S. (2016). Employee creativity and innovation in organizations: Review, integration, and future directions for hospitality research. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 28(5), 862–885.
Horng, J. S., Hong, J. C., ChanLin, L. J., Chang, S. H., & Chu, H. C. (2005). Creative teachers and creative teaching strategies. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 29(4), 352–358.
Hsiao, H. C., Chang, J. C., & Chen, S. C. (2014). The influence of support for innovation on organizational innovation: Taking organizational learning as a mediator. Asia Pacific Education Review, 23(3), 463–472.
Izzati, U. (2018). The relationships between vocational high school teachers' organizational climate and innovative behavior. 1st International Conference on Education Innovation (ICEI 2017),
343–345.
Janssen, O. (2000). Job demands, perceptions of effort‐reward fairness and innovative work behaviour. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 73(3), 287–302.
Kandemir, D., & Hult, G. T. M. (2005). A conceptualization of an organizational learning curve in international joint ventures. Industrial Marketing Management, 34(5), 430–439.
Karwowski, M. (2014). Creative mindsets: Measurement, correlates, consequences. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 8(1), 62–70.
Kibbeling, M., van der Bij, H., & van Weele, A. (2013). Market orientation and innovativeness in supply chains: Supplier's impact on customer satisfaction. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 30(3), 500–515.
Klaeijsen, A., Vermeulen, M., & Martens, R. (2018). Teachers’ innovative behaviour: The importance of basic psychological need satisfaction, intrinsic motivation, and occupational self-efficacy. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 62(5), 769–782.
Kwon, W. S., Woo, H., Sadachar, A., & Huang, X. (2021). External pressure or internal culture? An innovation diffusion theory account of small retail businesses’ social media use. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 62, 1–9.
Lambert, M. T. (2014). Privatization and the Public Good. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Education Press.
Marcu. (2013). Relationship of self-efficacy to stages of concern in the adoption of innovation in higher education. Doctoral dissertation, Virginia Polytechnic Institute.
Messmann, G., Mulder, R. H., & Palonen, T. (2018). Vocational education teachers’ personal network at school as a resource for innovative work behaviour. Journal of Workplace Learning, 30(3), 174–185.
Mushayikwa, E., & Lubben, F. (2009). Self-directed professional development–Hope for teachers working in deprived environments. Teaching and Teacher Education, 25(3), 375–382.
Pajares, F. (1996). Self-efficacy beliefs in achievement settings. Review of Educational Research, 66(4), 543–578.
Parker, S. K., Ward, M. K., & Fisher, G. (2021), Can high-quality jobs help adults learn new tricks? A multi-disciplinary review of work design for cognition. Academy of Management Annals, 15(2), 406–454.
Pinto, J. K., & Prescott, J. E. (1988). Variations in critical success factors over the stages in the project life cycle. Journal of Management, 14(1), 5–18.
Pratt, M. G., Pradies, C., & Lepisto, D. A. (2013). Doing well, doing good, and doing with: Organizational practices for effectively cultivating meaningful work. In B. Dik, Z. Byrne, & M. Steger (Eds.), Purpose and Meaning in the Workplace, 173–196. New York: American Psychological Association.
Ross, J. A., Cousins, J. B., & Gadalla, T. (1996). Within-teacher predictors of teacher efficacy. Teaching and Teacher Education, 12(4), 385–400.
Rusmansyah, R., Yuanita, L., Ibrahim, M., Isnawati, I., & Prahani, B. K. (2019). Innovative chemistry learning model: Improving the critical thinking skill and self-efficacy of pre-service chemistry teachers. Journal of Technology and Science Education, 9(1), 59–76.
Salancik, G. R., & Pfeffer, J. (1978). A social information processing approach to job attitudes and task design. Administrative Science Quarterly, 23(2), 224–253.
Schwarzer, R., & Knoll, N. (2007). Functional roles of social support within the stress and coping process: A theoretical and empirical overview. International Journal of Psychology, 42(4),
243–252.
Selingo, J. (2016). There Is Life After College: What Parents and Students Should Know about
Navigating School to Prepare for the Jobs Tomorrow. New York, NY.: William Morrow.
Senbeto, D. L., Hon, A. H., & Law, R. (2022). Organizational cultures determine employee innovation in response to seasonality: Regulatory processes of openness and resistance. Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research, 46(6), 1122–1146.
Serdyukov, P. (2017). Innovation in education: What works, what doesn’t, and what to do about it. Journal of Research in Innovative Teaching & Learning, 10(1), 4–33.
Shalley, C. E., Zhou, J., & Oldham, G. R. (2004). The effects of personal and contextual characteristics on creativity: Where should we go from here?. Journal of Management, 30(6), 933–958.
Spellings, M. (2006). A test of leadership: Charting the future of US higher education. US Department of Education. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED493504.pdf
Su, W., Lin, X., & Ding, H. (2019). The influence of supervisor developmental feedback on employee innovative behavior: A moderated mediation model. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 1–12.
Suseno, Y., Standing, C., Gengatharen, D., & Nguyen, D. (2020). Innovative work behaviour in the public sector: The roles of task characteristics, social support, and proactivity. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 79(1), 41–59.
Thurlings, M., Evers, A. T., & Vermeulen, M. (2015). Toward a model of explaining teachers’ innovative behavior: A literature review. Review of Educational Research, 85(3), 430–471.
Tierney, P., & Farmer, S. M. (2011). Creative self-efficacy development and creative performance over time. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(2), 277–293.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 JOURNAL OF ASIAN BUSINESS AND ECONOMIC STUDIES
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
