Các động lực thúc đẩy sự sáng tạo của nhân viên: Vai trò điều tiết hỗn hợp của động lực hướng đến xã hội
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24311/jabes/2019.30.2.3Từ khóa:
Động lực hướng đến xã hội, Động lực nội tại, Quyền tự quản công việc, Sự sáng tạo, Tự tin sáng tạoTóm tắt
Dựa trên lý thuyết động lực của sự sáng tạo, nghiên cứu này đề xuất động lực nội tại và tự tin sáng tạo tác động cùng chiều đến sự sáng tạo, đồng thời xem xét tác động gián tiếp của quyền tự quản công việc đến sự sáng tạo thông qua tự tin sáng tạo và động lực nội tại. Hơn nữa, nghiên cứu còn kiểm định vai trò điều tiết hỗn hợp của động lực hướng đến xã hội. Với dữ liệu khảo sát từ 323 nhân viên đang làm việc trong ngành công nghệ thông tin, kết quả cho thấy quyền tự quản công việc ảnh hưởng trực tiếp đến động lực nội tại và tự tin sáng tạo, đồng thời tác động gián tiếp đến sự sáng tạo của nhân viên thông qua động lực nội tại và tự tin sáng tạo. Cả ba động lực chính là tự tin sáng tạo, động lực nội tại và động lực hướng đến xã hội đều tác động tích cực đến sự sáng tạo theo mức độ giảm dần. Thêm vào đó, động lực hướng đến xã hội củng cố ảnh hưởng của tự tin sáng tạo lên sự sáng tạo. Tuy nhiên, động lực hướng đến xã hội không điều tiết mối quan hệ giữa động lực nội tại và sự sáng tạo của nhân viên.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Amabile, T. M. (1983). The social psychology of creativity: A componential conceptualization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45(2), 357–376.
Amabile, T. M. (1985). Motivation and creativity: Effects of motivational orientation on creative writers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48(2), 393–399.
Amabile, T. M. (1997). Motivating creativity in organizations: On doing what you love and loving what you do. California Management Review, 40(1), 39–58.
Anderson, N., Potočnik, K., & Zhou, J. (2014). Innovation and creativity in organizations: A state-of-the-science review, prospective commentary, and guiding framework. Journal of Management, 40(5), 1297–1333.
Bammens, Y. P. (2016). Employees' innovative behavior in social context: A closer examination of the role of organizational care. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 33(3), 244–259.
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The Exercise of Control (6th ed.). New York, NY: Macmillan.
Bandura, A., & Wood, R. (1989). Effect of perceived controllability and performance standards on self-regulation of complex decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56(5), 805–814.
Baumeister, R. F., Heatherton, T. F., & Tice, D. M. (1993). When ego threats lead to self-regulation failure: Negative consequences of high self-esteem. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64(1), 141–156.
Bergeron, D. M., Shipp, A. J., Rosen, B., & Furst, S. A. (2013). Organizational citizenship behavior and career outcomes: The cost of being a good citizen. Journal of Management, 39(4), 958–984.
Birdi, K., Leach, D., & Magadley, W. (2016). The relationship of individual capabilities and environmental support with different facets of designers' innovative behavior. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 33(1), 19–35.
Black, A. E., & Deci, E. L. (2000). The effects of instructors' autonomy support and students' autonomous motivation on learning organic chemistry: A self‐determination theory perspective. Science Education, 84(6), 740–756.
Bolino, M. C., & Grant, A. M. (2016). The bright side of being prosocial at work, and the dark side, too: A review and agenda for research on other-oriented motives, behavior, and impact in organizations. The Academy of Management Annals, 10(1), 599–670.
Bùi Thị Thanh. (2014). Các yếu tố ảnh hưởng đến sự sáng tạo của nhân viên trong các ngân hàng tại Việt Nam. Tạp chí Kinh tế và Phát triển, 208, 37–45.
Chen, T., Li, F., & Leung, K. (2016). When does supervisor support encourage innovative behavior? Opposite moderating effects of general self‐efficacy and internal locus of control. Personnel Psychology, 69(1), 123–158.
Coelho, F., & Augusto, M. (2010). Job characteristics and the creativity of frontline service employees. Journal of Service Research, 13(4), 426-438.
Cortina, J. M., Chen, G., & Dunlap, W. P. (2001). Testing interaction effects in LISREL: Examination and illustration of available procedures. Organizational Research Methods, 4(4), 324–360.
Coyne, I. T. (1997). Sampling in qualitative research. Purposeful and theoretical sampling; merging or clear boundaries?. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 26(3), 623–630.
Cronbach, L. J. (1987). Statistical tests for moderator variables: Flaws in analyses recently proposed. Psychological Bulletin, 102(3), 414–417.
Deci, E. L., Schwartz, A. J., Sheinman, L., & Ryan, R. M. (1981). An instrument to assess adults' orientations toward control versus autonomy with children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 73(5), 642–650.
Farmer, S. M., Tierney, P., & Kung-Mcintyre, K. (2003). Employee creativity in Taiwan: An application of role identity theory. Academy of Management Journal, 46(5), 618–630.
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50.
Gist, M. E., & Mitchell, T. R. (1992). Self-efficacy: A theoretical analysis of its determinants and malleability. Academy of Management Review, 17(2), 183–211.
Grant, A. M. (2007). Relational job design and the motivation to make a prosocial difference. Academy of Management review, 32(2), 393–417.
Grant, A. M. (2008). Does intrinsic motivation fuel the prosocial fire? Motivational synergy in predicting persistence, performance, and productivity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(1), 48–58.
Grant, A. M., & Berry, J. W. (2011). The necessity of others is the mother of invention: Intrinsic and prosocial motivations, perspective taking, and creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 54(1), 73–96.
Grant, A. M., & Sumanth, J. J. (2009). Mission possible? The performance of prosocially motivated employees depends on manager trustworthiness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(4), 927–944.
Grant, A. M., & Wrzesniewski, A. (2010). I won’t let you down… or will I? Core self-evaluations, other-orientation, anticipated guilt and gratitude, and job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(1), 108–121.
Hackman, J. R., & Oldham, G. R. (1975). Development of the job diagnostic survey. Journal of Applied Psychology, 60(2), 159–170.
Houghton, J. D., & DiLiello, T. C. (2010). Leadership development: The key to unlocking individual creativity in organizations. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 31(3), 230–245.
Javed, B., Abdullah, I., Zaffar, M. A., ul Haque, A., & Rubab, U. (2018). Inclusive leadership and innovative work behavior: The role of psychological empowerment. Journal of Management & Organization, 1–18. doi: 10.1017/jmo.2018.50
Javed, B., Naqvi, S. M. M. R., Khan, A. K., Arjoon, S., & Tayyeb, H. H. (2017). Impact of inclusive leadership on innovative work behavior: The role of psychological safety. Journal of Management & Organization, 25(1), 117–136.
Joo, B. K. B., Jeung, C. W., & Yoon, H. J. (2010). Investigating the influences of core self‐evaluations, job autonomy, and intrinsic motivation on in‐role job performance. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 21(4), 353–371.
Komarraju, M., Karau, S. J., & Schmeck, R. R. (2009). Role of the Big Five personality traits in predicting college students' academic motivation and achievement. Learning and Individual Differences, 19(1), 47–52.
Korsgaard, M. A., Meglino, B. M., & Lester, S. W. (1997). Beyond helping: Do other-oriented values have broader implications in organizations?. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82(1), 160–177.
Korsgaard, M. A., Meglino, B. M., Lester, S. W., & Jeong, S. S. (2010). Paying you back or paying me forward: understanding rewarded and unrewarded organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(2), 277–290.
Liu, D., Jiang, K., Shalley, C. E., Keem, S., & Zhou, J. (2016). Motivational mechanisms of employee creativity: A meta-analytic examination and theoretical extension of the creativity literature. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 137(C), 236–263.
Llopis, O., & Foss, N. J. (2016). Understanding the climate–knowledge sharing relation: The moderating roles of intrinsic motivation and job autonomy. European Management Journal, 34(2), 135–144.
McAdams, D. P., & de St Aubin, E. (1992). A theory of generativity and its assessment through self-report, behavioral acts, and narrative themes in autobiography. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62(6), 1003–1015.
Morgeson, F. P., Delaney-Klinger, K., & Hemingway, M. A. (2005). The importance of job autonomy, cognitive ability, and job-related skill for predicting role breadth and job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(2), 399–406.
Muthén, B., & Kaplan, D. (1985). A comparison of some methodologies for the factor analysis of non‐normal Likert variables. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 38(2), 171–189.
Oldham, G. R., & Cummings, A. (1996). Employee creativity: Personal and contextual factors at work. Academy of Management Journal, 39(3), 607–634.
Overall, N. C., Deane, K. L., & Peterson, E. R. (2011). Promoting doctoral students' research self-efficacy: Combining academic guidance with autonomy support. Higher Education Research & Development, 30(6), 791–805.
Parker, S. K. (1998). Enhancing role breadth self-efficacy: The roles of job enrichment and other organizational interventions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83(6), 835–852.
Parker, S. K., & Axtell, C. M. (2001). Seeing another viewpoint: Antecedents and outcomes of employee perspective taking. Academy of Management Journal, 44(6), 1085–1100.
Parker, S. K., Wall, T. D., & Jackson, P. R. (1997). “That's not my job”: Developing flexible employee work orientations. Academy of Management Journal, 40(4), 899–929.
Ping, R. A. (1995). A parsimonious estimating technique for interaction and quadratic latent variables. Journal of Marketing Research, 32(3), 336–347.
Schwartz, S. H., Sagiv, L., & Boehnke, K. (2000). Worries and values. Journal of Personality, 68(2), 309–346.
Schweisfurth, T. G., & Raasch, C. (2018). Absorptive capacity for need knowledge: Antecedents and effects for employee innovativeness. Research Policy, 47(4), 687–699.
Shalley, C. E., Zhou, J., & Oldham, G. R. (2004). The effects of personal and contextual characteristics on creativity: Where should we go from here?. Journal of Management, 30(6), 933–958.
Soda, G., Stea, D., & Pedersen, T. (2019). Network structure, collaborative context, and individual creativity. Journal of Management, 45(4), 1739–1765.
Spector, P. E. (1986). Perceived control by employees: A meta-analysis of studies concerning autonomy and participation at work. Human Relations, 39(11), 1005–1016.
Steenkamp, J.–B. E., & van Trijp, H. C. (1991). The use of LISREL in validating marketing constructs. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 8(4), 283–299.
Tierney, P., & Farmer, S. M. (2002). Creative self-efficacy: Its potential antecedents and relationship to creative performance. Academy of Management Journal, 45(6), 1137–1148.
Tierney, P., & Farmer, S. M. (2004). The Pygmalion process and employee creativity. Journal of Management, 30(3), 413–432.
Tierney, P., & Farmer, S. M. (2011). Creative self-efficacy development and creative performance over time. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(2), 277–293.
Tierney, P., Farmer, S. M., & Graen, G. B. (1999). An examination of leadership and employee creativity: The relevance of traits and relationships. Personnel Psychology, 52(3), 591–620.
Volmer, J., Spurk, D., & Niessen, C. (2012). Leader-member exchange (LMX), job autonomy, and creative work involvement. The Leadership Quarterly, 23(3), 456–465.
Wang, A. C., & Cheng, B. S. (2010). When does benevolent leadership lead to creativity? The moderating role of creative role identity and job autonomy. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 31(1), 106–121.
Wu, C.–H., Parker, S. K., & De Jong, J. P. (2014). Need for cognition as an antecedent of individual innovation behavior. Journal of Management, 40(6), 1511–1534.
Yuan, F., & Woodman, R. W. (2010). Innovative behavior in the workplace: The role of performance and image outcome expectations. Academy of Management Journal, 53(2), 323–342.
Zhou, J. (1998). Feedback valence, feedback style, task autonomy, and achievement orientation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83(2), 261–276.
Lượt tải xuống
Đã Xuất bản
Số
Chuyên mục
Giấy phép
Bản quyền (c) {copyrightHolder}
Tác phẩm này được cấp phép theo Giấy phép Creative Commons Ghi công-Phi thương mại 4.0 Quốc tế.
