Tác động của lãnh đạo chuyên quyền đến nghỉ việc thầm lặng: Vai trò trung gian của sự thất vọng nhu cầu tâm lý cơ bản
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24311/jabes/2026.37.04.5Từ khóa:
Nghỉ việc thầm lặng, Nhu cầu tâm lý cơ bản, Lãnh đạo chuyên quyềnTóm tắt
Nghiên cứu này nhằm kiểm tra tác động của lãnh đạo chuyên quyền đối với sự thất vọng nhu cầu tâm lý cơ bản và nghỉ việc thầm lặng của nhân viên. Đồng thời, nghiên cứu xem xét vai trò trung gian của sự thất vọng nhu cầu tâm lý cơ bản trong việc lý giải cơ chế mà qua đó lãnh đạo chuyên quyền thúc đẩy hành vi nghỉ việc thầm lặng. Dữ liệu được thu thập từ 244 nhân viên ngân hàng tại Việt Nam và được phân tích bằng PLS-SEM. Kết quả cho thấy lãnh đạo chuyên quyền có mối quan hệ tích cực với sự thất vọng nhu cầu tâm lý cơ bản và nghỉ việc thầm lặng, đồng thời sự thất vọng nhu cầu tâm lý cơ bản dự đoán đáng kể hành vi nghỉ việc thầm lặng và đóng vai trò trung gian trong mối quan hệ giữa lãnh đạo chuyên quyền và nghỉ việc thầm lặng. Nghiên cứu này đóng góp cho lĩnh vực lãnh đạo và tâm lý học tổ chức, đồng thời cung cấp những hàm ý thực tiễn cho các tổ chức trong việc xây dựng môi trường làm việc hỗ trợ tâm lý, thúc đẩy phong cách lãnh đạo tích cực và giảm thiểu xu hướng nghỉ việc thầm lặng
Tài liệu tham khảo
Akhtar, M. W., Garavan, T., Syed, F., Huo, C., Javed, M., & O’Brien, F. (2024). Despotic leadership and front-line employee deviant work behaviors in service organizations: The roles of moral disengagement and moral identity. Journal of Service Research, 27(4), 600-616. https://doi.org/10.1177/10946705231207991
Alang, T., Stanton, P., & Rose, M. (2022). Enhancing employee voice and inclusion through inclusive leadership in public sector organizations. Public Personnel Management, 51(3), 309-329. https://doi.org/10.1177/00910260221085583
Anand, A., Doll, J., & Ray, P. (2024). Drowning in silence: A scale development and validation of quiet quitting and quiet firing. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 32(4), 721-743. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOA-01-2023-3600
Báo Chính phủ. (2025). Xây dựng Trung tâm tài chính quốc tế tại Việt Nam: Khung pháp lý phải phù hợp với chuẩn mực quốc tế. Truy cập ngày 12/11/2025, từ https://baochinhphu.vn/xay-dung-trung-tam-tai-chinh-quoc-te-tai-viet-nam-khung-phap-ly-phai-phu-hop-voi-chuan-muc-quoc-te-102250322141129581.htm
Bartholomew, K. J., Ntoumanis, N., Ryan, R. M., Bosch, J. A., & Thøgersen-Ntoumani, C. (2011). Self-determination theory and diminished functioning: The role of interpersonal control and psychological need thwarting. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37(11), 1459-1473. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167211413125
Bordoloi, S., Sharma, A., & Dhar, R. L. (2025). Leveraging SOR theory to understand quiet quitting: Systematic insights from existing research. Management Review Quarterly, 1-30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11301-025-00518-4
Busque-Carrier, M., Ratelle, C. F., & Le Corff, Y. (2022). Work values and job satisfaction: The mediating role of basic psychological needs at work. Journal of Career Development, 49(6), 1386-1401. https://doi.org/10.1177/08948453211043878
Chen, B., Vansteenkiste, M., Beyers, W., Boone, L., Deci, E. L., Van der Kaap-Deeder, J., . . . Verstuyf, J. (2015). Basic psychological need satisfaction, need frustration, and need strength across four cultures. Motivation and Emotion, 39, 216-236. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-014-9450-1
Chin, W. W. (2009). How to write up and report PLS analyses. In Handbook of Partial Least Squares: Concepts, Methods and Applications (pp. 655-690). Berlin, Germany: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-32827-8
Cohen, J. (2013). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. New York, NY: Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203771587
De Clerck, T., Haerens, L., Devos, G., & Willem, A. (2024). A self‐determination theory perspective on how autonomy‐supportive and chaotic leadership relate to volunteers' need‐based experiences and turnover intentions: A variable‐centered and person‐centered approach. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 34(4), 777-800. https://doi.org/10.1002/nml.21591
De Clercq, D., Fatima, T., & Jahanzeb, S. (2021). Ingratiating with despotic leaders to gain status: The role of power distance orientation and self-enhancement motive. Journal of Business Ethics, 171(1), 157-174. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-019-04368-5
De Hoogh, A. H. B., & Den Hartog, D. N. (2008). Ethical and despotic leadership, relationships with leader's social responsibility, top management team effectiveness, and subordinates' optimism: A multi-method study. The Leadership Quarterly, 19(3), 297-311. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2008.03.002
Ergen, H., Giliç, F., Yücedağlar, A., & İnandi, Y. (2025). Leadership styles and quiet quitting in school context: Unveiling mobbing as a mediator. Frontiers in Psychology, 16, 1538444. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1538444
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104
Galanis, P., Moisoglou, I., Katsiroumpa, A., Malliarou, M., Vraka, I., & Gallos, P. (2024). Impact of workplace bullying on quiet quitting in nurses: The mediating effect of coping strategies. Healthcare, 12(7), 797-808. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare12070797
Gone, Y. S. P., Naim, M. F., & Peethambaran, M. (2026). Sounding the silence: Examining the antecedents and outcomes of quiet quitting. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 34(1), 165-184. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOA-09-2024-4794
Gün, İ., Balsak, H., & Ayhan, F. (2025). Mediating effect of job burnout on the relationship between organisational support and quiet quitting in nurses. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 81(8), 4644-4652. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.16599
Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., Sarstedt, M., Danks, N. P., & Ray, S. (2017). Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) Using R: A Workbook. Cham, Switzerland: Springer Nature.
Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review, 31(1), 2-24. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-11-2018-0203
Hamid, Z. (2025). The effects of servant leadership and despotic leadership on employees’ happiness at work (HAW): The role of job crafting. Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Administration, 17(1), 23-45. https://doi.org/10.1108/APJBA-07-2023-0344
Hamouche, S., Koritos, C., & Papastathopoulos, A. (2023). Quiet quitting: Relationship with other concepts and implications for tourism and hospitality. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 35(12), 4297-4312. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCHM-11-2022-1362
Haw, I. M., Ho, S. S., Hu, B., & Wu, D. (2010). Concentrated control, institutions, and banking sector: An international study. Journal of Banking & Finance, 34(3), 485-497. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2009.08.013
Hobfoll, S. E. (1989). Conservation of resources: A new attempt at conceptualizing stress. American Psychologist, 44(3), 513-524. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066x.44.3.513
Khan, J., Mubarak, N., Khattak, S. A., Safdar, S., & Jaafar, M. (2022). Despotic leadership and IT project efficiency: The role of resilience. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 15(3), 449-468. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJMPB-01-2021-0019
McKinsey. (2025). HR monitor 2025. Retrieved from https://www.mckinsey.com/~/media/mckinsey/business%20functions/people%20and%20organizational%20performance/our%20insights/hr%20monitor%202025/hr-monitor-2025.pdf
Mehmood, K., Ullah, U., Usman, M., Abbas, A., & Han, S. (2024). Despotic leadership and followers creativity: Exploring the combined effects of power distance and psychological safety. BMC Psychology, 12(1), 728. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-024-02242-2
Mubarak, N., Khan, J., Bashir, S., & Safdar, S. (2024). Dark side of leadership and information technology project success: The role of mindfulness. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 39(3), 304-322. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMP-04-2022-0182
Naseer, S., Raja, U., Syed, F., Donia, M. B. L., & Darr, W. (2016). Perils of being close to a bad leader in a bad environment: Exploring the combined effects of despotic leadership, leader member exchange, and perceived organizational politics on behaviors. The Leadership Quarterly, 27(1), 14-33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2015.09.005
Nauman, S., Zheng, C., & Basit, A. (2021). How despotic leadership jeopardizes employees' performance: The roles of quality of work life and work withdrawal. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 42(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1108/LODJ-11-2019-0476
Ngân hàng Nhà nước Việt Nam. (2025). Danh sách các ngân hàng thương mại cổ phần trong nước (đến 30/9/2025). Truy cập ngày 22/11/2025, từ https://sbv.gov.vn/vi/w/danh-s%C3%A1ch-c%C3%A1c-ng%C3%A2n-h%C3%A0ng-tmcp-trong-n%C6%B0%E1%BB%9Bc-%C4%91%E1%BA%BFn-30/9/2025-1
Nguyễn Hải Quang, & Đặng Ngọc Đại. (2025). Tác động của phong cách lãnh đạo và môi trường làm việc đến sự nhiệt huyết và hiệu suất công việc của nhân viên ngành ngân hàng. Tạp chí Kinh tế và Phát triển, 341, 2-12. https://doi.org/10.33301/JED.VI.2675
Nguyễn Thị Như Quỳnh, & Lê Đình Luân. (2023). Tác động của chuyển đổi số đến năng lực cạnh tranh của các Ngân hàng Thương mại tại Việt Nam. Tạp chí Khoa học Đại học Mở thành phố Hồ Chí Minh - Kinh tế và Quản trị kinh doanh, 18(2), 104-118. https://doi.org/10.46223/HCMCOUJS.econ.vi.18.2.2098.2023
Nguyen, D. T. N., Teo, S. T. T., Grover, S. L., & Nguyen, N. P. (2019). Respect, bullying, and public sector work outcomes in Vietnam. Public Management Review, 21(6), 863-889. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2018.1538426
Nguyen, M., & Truong, M. (2016). The effect of culture on enterprise's perception of corporate social responsibility: The case of Vietnam. Procedia CIRP, 40, 680-686. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2016.01.154
Olafsen, A. H., Niemiec, C. P., Halvari, H., Deci, E. L., & Williams, G. C. (2017). On the dark side of work: A longitudinal analysis using self-determination theory. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 26(2), 275-285. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2016.1257611
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879-903. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
Prentice, C., Dominique-Ferreira, S., Wang, X., Tuominen, J., Duarte, M., & Rocha, H. (2025). Work-life imbalance, burning out, feeling down, I will quit, but quietly – the case of hospitality employees. Journal of Hospitality Marketing & Management, 34(1), 24-45. https://doi.org/10.1080/19368623.2024.2389074
Rafiq, N., Sarwar, A., & Rasheed, M. (2023). Disruption in family life due to despotic leadership and COVID-19: The mediating role of emotional exhaustion. Kybernetes, 52(7), 2305-2328. https://doi.org/10.1108/K-05-2022-0717
Raza, M. A., Imran, M., Pervaiz, U., & Khan, M. J. (2024). How leader’s psychological entitlement leads to despotic leadership causing employee-instigated workplace incivility: Mediation of emotional exhaustion and moderation of Islamic work ethics. Journal of Islamic Accounting and Business Research. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIABR-01-2024-0002
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68-78. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066x.55.1.68
Sabagh, Z., Hall, N. C., Saroyan, A., & Trépanier, S. G. (2022). Occupational factors and faculty well-being: Investigating the mediating role of need frustration. The Journal of Higher Education, 93(4), 559-584. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2021.2004810
Shahzad, K., Naz, F., Iqbal, R., & Chaudhary, R. (2024). When despotic leadership is more detrimental for employee job outcomes? Role of individual-level power distance orientation. Journal of Organizational Effectiveness: People and Performance, 12(3), 519-536. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOEPP-12-2023-0547
Sun, H., Guo, H., Wang, K., Sun, L., & Wang, L. (2021). Upward ingratiation outside the workplace and supervisor’s human resource decisions: Moderating effect of zhongyong thinking. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 636756. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.636756
Thakur, P., & Srivastava, S. (2025). The dark side of leadership: How despotic leadership triggers depression and quiet quitting. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 37(9), 3180-3199. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCHM-12-2024-1815
Thi, S. T., Thao, N. H. T., & Kim, P. T. (2025). Technology overload and subjective well-being in Vietnamese banks: The mediating role of work-family conflict, with leader-member exchange and perceived organizational support as moderators. The Journal of Behavioral Science, 20(2), 106-120. https://so06.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/IJBS/article/view/283996
Thu Trang, P., & Thi Thu Trang, N. (2024). Job burnout and quiet quitting in Vietnamese banking sector: The moderation effect of optimism. Cogent Business & Management, 11(1), 2371549. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2024.2371549
Trépanier, S. G., Boudrias, V., & Peterson, C. (2019). Linking destructive forms of leadership to employee health. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 40(7), 803-814. https://doi.org/10.1108/LODJ-04-2019-0168
Van der Goot, W. E., Van Yperen, N. W., Albers, C. J., Jaarsma, A. D. C., & Duvivier, R. J. (2025). Effects of (de) motivating supervision styles on junior doctors’ intrinsic motivation through basic psychological need frustration and satisfaction: An experimental vignette study. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 30(2), 401-426. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-024-10344-0
Vansteenkiste, M., & Ryan, R. M. (2013). On psychological growth and vulnerability: Basic psychological need satisfaction and need frustration as a unifying principle. Journal of Psychotherapy Integration, 23(3), 263-280. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032359
Lượt tải xuống
Đã Xuất bản
Số
Chuyên mục
Giấy phép
Bản quyền (c) {copyrightHolder}
Tác phẩm này được cấp phép theo Giấy phép Creative Commons Ghi công-Phi thương mại 4.0 Quốc tế.
