Ảnh hưởng của thu nhận và cung cấp kiến thức đến sự đổi mới: Vai trò trung gian của sáng tạo cá nhân
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24311/jabes/2022.33.09.08Keywords:
Knowledge, Creativity, Innovation, BankingAbstract
The objective of this study is to examine the influence of knowledge acquisition and knowledge provision on individual creativity and service innovation in the banking sector. The data was collected through a survey of 268 employees working in the banking sector in Ho Chi Minh City. A Structural Equation Modeling procedure was used to test hypotheses. Results indicate that knowledge acquisition has a positive effect on individual creativity. Individual creativity has a positive effect on service innovation and plays mediating role in the relationship between knowledge provision, acquisition and service innovation. Based on the analysis results, the study provides some implications to increase individual creativity in the banking sector to promote service innovation.
References
Ahmed, F., Shahzad, K., Aslam, H., Bajwa, S. U., & Bahoo, R. (2016). The role of collaborative culture in knowledge sharing and creativity among employees. Pakistan Journal of Commerce and Social Sciences (PJCSS), 10(2), 335–358.
Allameh, S. M., Khozani, M. K., & Baniasadi, B. (2020). Consequences of knowledge processes in small businesses: The role of knowledge acquisition, dynamic capabilities, knowledge sharing and creativity. International Journal of Process Management and Benchmarking, 10(1), 48–68.
Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity in Context: Update to “The Social Psychology of Creativity”. Boulder, CO: Westview.
Amabile, T. M., & Pillemer, J. (2012). Perspectives on the social psychology of creativity. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 46(1), 3–15.
Andrews, J., & Smith, D. C. (1996). In search of the marketing imagination: Factors affecting the creativity of marketing programs for mature products. Journal of Marketing Research, 33,
174–187.
Ardichvili, A., Page, V., & Wentling, T. (2003). Motivation and barriers to participation in virtual knowledge‐sharing communities of practice. Journal of Knowledge Management, 7(1), 64–77
Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural Equations with Latent Variables. New York: John Wiley &
Sons, Inc.
Bùi Thị Thanh. (2014). Các yếu tố ảnh hưởng đến sự sáng tạo của nhân viên trong các ngân hàng tại Việt Nam. Tạp chí Kinh tế và Phát triển, 208, 37–45.
Chang, J. H., & Teng, C. C. (2017). Intrinsic or extrinsic motivations for hospitality employees’ creativity: The moderating role of organization-level regulatory focus. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 60, 133–141.
Chang, S., Jia, L., Takeuchi, R., & Cai, Y. (2014). Do high-commitment work systems affect creativity? A multilevel combinational approach to employee creativity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 99(4), 665–680.
Cleveland, S., & Ellis, T. J. (2015). Rethinking knowledge sharing barriers: A content analysis of 103 studies. International Journal of Knowledge Management (IJKM), 11(1), 28–51.
Davenport, T. H., & Prusak, L. (1998). Working Knowledge: How Organizations Manage What They Know. Harvard Business Press.
de Jong, J. P., & den Hartog, D. N. (2007). How leaders influence employees' innovative behaviour. European Journal of Innovation Management, 10(1), 41–64.
El-Kassar, A. N., Dagher, G. K., Lythreatis, S., & Azakir, M. (2022). Antecedents and consequences of knowledge hiding: The roles of HR practices, organizational support for creativity, creativity, innovative work behavior, and task performance. Journal of Business Research, 140, 1–10.
Giannopoulou, E., Gryszkiewicz, L., & Barlatier, P. J. (2014). Creativity for service innovation: A practice-based perspective. Managing Service Quality, 24(1), 23–44.
Grawe, S. J, Chen, H, & Daugherty, P. J. (2009). The relationship between strategic orientation, service innovation, and performance. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 39(4), 282–300.
Griffith, D. A., Kiessling, T., & Dabic, M. (2012). Aligning strategic orientation with local market conditions: Implications for subsidiary knowledge management. International Marketing Review, 29(4), 379–402.
Hayton, J. C., Carnabuci, G., & Eisenberger, R. (2012). With a little help from my colleagues: A social embeddedness approach to perceived organizational support. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 33, 235–249.
Howard, T. J., Culley, S. J., & Dekoninck, E. (2008). Describing the creative design process by the integration of engineering design and cognitive psychology literature. Design Studies, 29(2),
160–180.
Huang, C. E., & Liu, C. H. (2019). Impacts of social capital and knowledge acquisition on service innovation: An integrated empirical analysis of the role of shared values. Journal of Hospitality Marketing & Management, 28(5), 645–664.
Jelinek, R. (2017). A permaculture primer: Using eco-theory to promote knowledge acquisition, dissemination and use in the sales organization. Industrial Marketing Management, 65, 206–216.
Kim, H. H., & Choi, J. N. (2022). How to translate creative ideas into innovation? Differential resources for proactive and responsive team idea generation. Creativity Research Journal. doi: 10.1080/10400419.2021.1997468
Le, P. B., Lei, H., Le, T. T., Gong, J., & Ha, A. T. (2020). Developing a collaborative culture for radical and incremental innovation: The mediating roles of tacit and explicit knowledge sharing. Chinese Management Studies, 14(4), 957–975.
Liu, D., Gong, Y., Zhou, J., & Huang, J. C. (2017). Human resource systems, employee creativity, and firm innovation: The moderating role of firm ownership. Academy of Management Journal, 60(3), 1164–1188.
Milton, N. (2007) Knowledge Acquisition in Practice A Step-by-Step Guide. London:
Springer-Verlag.
Perry-Smith, J. E., & Shalley, C. E. (2003). The social side of creativity: A static and dynamic social network perspective. Academy of Management Review, 28(1), 89–106.
Reinholt, M. I. A., Pedersen, T., & Foss, N. J. (2011). Why a central network position isn't enough: The role of motivation and ability for knowledge sharing in employee networks. Academy of Management Journal, 54(6), 1277–1297.
Reychav, I., & Weisberg, J. (2010). Bridging intention and behavior of knowledge sharing. Journal of Knowledge Management, 14(2), 285–300.
Saunila, M., Mäkimattila, M., & Salminen, J. (2014). Matrix structure for supporting organisational innovation capability. International Journal of Business Innovation and Research, 8(1), 20–35.
Soda, G., Stea, D., & Pedersen, T. (2019). Network structure, collaborative context, and individual creativity. Journal of Management, 45(4), 1739–1765.
Tang, L. M., & Werner, C. (Eds.). (2017). Handbook of the Management of Creativity and Innovation: Theory and Practice. World Scientific Publishing Company.
Van Den Hooff, B., & de Ridder, J. A. (2004). Knowledge sharing in context: The influence of organizational commitment, communication climate and CMC use on knowledge sharing. Journal of Knowledge Management, 8(6),117–130.
Võ Thành Đức, & Trần Hà Minh Quân. (2021). Tư duy nghịch lý và áp lực học tập thúc đẩy sự sáng tạo và kết quả công việc của nhân viên: Nghiên cứu trong lĩnh vực dịch vụ ngân hàng tại Việt Nam. Tạp chí Nghiên cứu Kinh tế và Kinh doanh Châu Á, 31(10), 40–53.
Wang, Z., & Wang, N. (2012). Knowledge sharing, innovation and firm performance. Expert Systems with Applications, 39(10), 8899–8908.
Zhou, J., & George, J. M. (20010.When job dissatisfaction leads to creativity: Encouraging the expression of voice. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 682–696.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 JOURNAL OF ASIAN BUSINESS AND ECONOMIC STUDIES
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
