Phản hồi phát triển của quản lý và sự sáng tạo của cấp dưới:  Vai trò của điều chỉnh nhiệm vụ và động lực hướng đến xã hội

Thanh Bùi Thị Thanh; Tấn Phan Quốc Tấn; Thuận Lê Công; Anh Trần Ngọc Phương

doi:0.24311/jabes/2024.35.10.02

Các tác giả

Bùi Thị Thanh Đại học Kinh tế Thành phố Hồ Chí Minh Tác giả
Phan Quốc Tấn Đại học Kinh tế Thành phố Hồ Chí Minh Tác giả
Lê Công Thuận Đại học Kinh tế Thành phố Hồ Chí Minh Tác giả
Trần Ngọc Phương Anh Đại học Kinh tế Thành phố Hồ Chí Minh Tác giả

DOI:

https://doi.org/0.24311/jabes/2024.35.10.02

Từ khóa:

Điều chỉnh nhiệm vụ, Động lực hướng đến xã hội, Sự sáng tạo của cấp dưới, Phản hồi phát triển

Tóm tắt

Mặc dù phản hồi phát triển của quản lý ảnh hưởng đến sự sáng tạo của cấp dưới, nhưng mối quan hệ này không nhất quán. Một số nghiên cứu kết luận rằng mối quan hệ này là dương và có ý nghĩa thống kê, trong khi đó các nghiên cứu khác cho thấy mối quan hệ này không có ý nghĩa thống kê. Dựa vào mô hình khả năng - động lực - cơ hội, nghiên cứu này kiểm định vai trò trung gian của điều chỉnh nhiệm vụ và vai trò điều tiết của động lực hướng đến xã hội để hiểu sâu sắc hơn mối quan hệ này. Bài báo này sử dụng phương pháp phân tích nhân tố khẳng định (CFA) để kiểm định thang đo và phân tích mô hình cấu trúc tuyến tính (SEM) để kiểm định các giả thuyết. Kết quả nghiên cứu cho thấy điều chỉnh nhiệm vụ là trung gian liên kết phản hồi phát triển của quản lý đến sự sáng tạo của cấp dưới. Hơn nữa, động lực hướng đến xã hội điều tiết mối quan hệ này. Từ đó, nghiên cứu này đóng góp mới về mặt lý thuyết cũng như đưa ra các hàm ý quản trị để nâng cao sự sáng tạo của nhân viên.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Amabile, T. M. (1983). The social psychology of creativity: A componential conceptualization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45(2), 357-376.

Anderson, N., Potočnik, K., & Zhou, J. (2014). Innovation and creativity in organizations: A state-of-the-science review, prospective commentary, and guiding framework. Journal of Management, 40(5), 1297-1333.

Bavik, A., & Kuo, C.-F. (2022). A systematic review of creativity in tourism and hospitality. The Service Industries Journal, 42(5-6), 321-359.

Blumberg, M., & Pringle, C. D. (1982). The missing opportunity in organizational research: Some implications for a theory of work performance. Academy of Management Review, 7(4), 560-569.

Cortina, J. M., Chen, G., & Dunlap, W. P. (2001). Testing interaction effects in LISREL: Examination and illustration of available procedures. Organizational Research Methods, 4(4), 324-360.

Coyne, I. T. (1997). Sampling in qualitative research. Purposeful and theoretical sampling; merging or clear boundaries? Journal of Advanced Nursing, 26(3), 623-630.

Cronbach, L. J. (1987). Statistical tests for moderator variables: Flaws in analyses recently proposed. Psychological Bulletin, 102(3), 414-417.

Chang, Y.-Y., Gong, Y., & Peng, M. W. (2012). Expatriate knowledge transfer, subsidiary absorptive capacity, and subsidiary performance. Academy of Management Journal, 55(4), 927-948.

Demerouti, E., Bakker, A. B., & Gevers, J. M. (2015). Job crafting and extra-role behavior: The role of work engagement and flourishing. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 91, 87-96.

Etikan, I., Musa, S. A., & Alkassim, R. S. (2016). Comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling. American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics, 5(1), 1-4.

Fehr, R., Fulmer, A., Awtrey, E., & Miller, J. A. (2017). The grateful workplace: A multilevel model of gratitude in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 42(2), 361-381.

Fischer, T., Dietz, J., & Antonakis, J. (2017). Leadership process models: A review and synthesis. Journal of Management, 43(6), 1726-1753.

Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50.

George, J. M., & Zhou, J. (2007). Dual tuning in a supportive context: Joint contributions of positive mood, negative mood, and supervisory behaviors to employee creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 50(3), 605-622.

Grant, A. M. (2008). Does intrinsic motivation fuel the prosocial fire? Motivational synergy in predicting persistence, performance, and productivity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(1),

48-58.

Grant, A. M., & Berry, J. W. (2011). The necessity of others is the mother of invention: Intrinsic and prosocial motivations, perspective taking, and creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 54(1), 73-96.

Grant, A. M., & Sumanth, J. J. (2009). Mission possible? The performance of prosocially motivated employees depends on manager trustworthiness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(4), 927-944.

Guo, Y., Xiong, G., Shaw, K.-H., Liao, J., Zhang, Z., & Yi, F. (2023). Why does developmental feedback foster employee job performance? The mediating role of job crafting. Sage Open, 13(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440231185523

Hair, J., Black, W., Babin, B., & Anderson, R. (2013). Multivariate Data Analysis: New International Edition (7th ed.). London: Pearson.

Hughes, D. J., Lee, A., Tian, A. W., Newman, A., & Legood, A. (2018). Leadership, creativity, and innovation: A critical review and practical recommendations. The Leadership Quarterly, 29(5), 549-569.

Hur, W.-M., Shin, Y., Rhee, S.-Y., & Kim, H. (2017). Organizational virtuousness perceptions and task crafting: The mediating roles of organizational identification and work engagement. Career Development International, 22(4), 436-459.

Kanfer, R., Frese, M., & Johnson, R. (2017). Motivation related to work: A century of progress. Journal of Applied Psychology, 102(3), 338-355.

Kanten, P. (2014). The antecedents of job crafting: Perceived organizational support, job characteristics and self-efficacy. European Journal of Business and Social Sciences, 3(5),

113-128.

Kim, Y. J., & Kim, J. (2020). Does negative feedback benefit (or harm) recipient creativity? The role of the direction of feedback flow. Academy of Management Journal, 63(2), 584-612.

Koseoglu, G., Liu, Y., & Shalley, C. E. (2017). Working with creative leaders: Exploring the relationship between supervisors' and subordinates' creativity. The Leadership Quarterly, 28(6), 798-811.

Lebel, R. D., & Patil, S. V. (2018). Proactivity despite discouraging supervisors: The powerful role of prosocial motivation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 103(7), 724-737.

Li, G., & Xie, L. (2023). The effects of job involvement and supervisor developmental feedback on employee creativity: A polynomial regression with response surface analysis. Current Psychology, 42(20), 17120-17131.

Lin, B., Law, K. S., & Zhou, J. (2017). Why is underemployment related to creativity and OCB? A task-crafting explanation of the curvilinear moderated relations. Academy of Management Journal, 60(1), 156-177.

Liu, B., Yun, J., & Zhao, J. (2024). The dual‐path mechanism underlying the influence of customers' negative feedback on the job crafting. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 97(4), 1526-1549.

Liu, D., Gong, Y., Zhou, J., & Huang, J.-C. (2017). Human resource systems, employee creativity, and firm innovation: The moderating role of firm ownership. Academy of Management Journal, 60(3), 1164-1188.

Meglino, B. M., & Korsgaard, A. (2004). Considering rational self-interest as a disposition: Organizational implications of other orientation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(6), 946-959.

Mumford, M. D., Fichtel, M., England, S., & Newbold, T. R. (2023). Leader thinking, follower thinking: Leader impacts on follower creative performance. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 10(1), 413-440. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4337238

Muthén, B., & Kaplan, D. (1985). A comparison of some methodologies for the factor analysis of non‐normal Likert variables. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 38(2), 171-189.

Ping, R. A. (1995). A parsimonious estimating technique for interaction and quadratic latent variables. Journal of Marketing Research, 32(3), 336-347.

Reinholt, M., Pedersen, T., & Foss, N. J. (2011). Why a central network position isn't enough: The role of motivation and ability for knowledge sharing in employee networks. Academy of Management Journal, 54(6), 1277-1297.

Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68-78.

Shalley, C. E., Zhou, J., & Oldham, G. R. (2004). The effects of personal and contextual characteristics on creativity: Where should we go from here? Journal of Management, 30(6),

933-958.

Shang, Y., Xu, J., & Liu, H. (2024). Supervisor developmental feedback and postgraduate student creativity: A relationship quality perspective. Higher Education, 87, 381-399. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-023-01012-0

Shin, S. J., Jeong, I., & Bae, J. (2018). Do high-involvement HRM practices matter for worker creativity? A cross-level approach. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 29(2), 260-285.

Slemp, G. R., & Vella-Brodrick, D. A. (2014). Optimising employee mental health: The relationship between intrinsic need satisfaction, job crafting, and employee well-being. Journal of Happiness Studies, 15, 957-977.

Soda, G., Stea, D., & Pedersen, T. (2019). Network structure, collaborative context, and individual creativity. Journal of Management, 45(4), 1739-1765.

Steenkamp, J.-B. E., & van Trijp, H. C. (1991). The use of LISREL in validating marketing constructs. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 8(4), 283-299.

Su, W., Lin, X., & Ding, H. (2019). The influence of supervisor developmental feedback on employee innovative behavior: A moderated mediation model. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 1581.

Su, W., Lyu, B., & London, M. (2022a). Relationships between developmental feedback, intrinsic motivation, and creative personality and performance. Psihologija, 55(1), 25-44.

Su, W., Qi, Q., & Yuan, S. (2022b). A moderated mediation model of academic supervisor developmental feedback and postgraduate student creativity: Evidence from China. Behavioral Sciences, 12(12), 484.

Tian, W., Wang, H., & Rispens, S. (2021). How and when job crafting relates to employee creativity: The important roles of work engagement and perceived work group status diversity. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(1), 291.

Tiantian, X., Zhenduo, Z., Huan, X., Jing, X., & Wentong, J. (2021). The curvilinear relationship between job control and voice: Role of emotional resistance to change and supervisor developmental feedback. Sage Open, 11(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440211027960

Tims, M., Bakker, A. B., Derks, D., & van Rhenen, W. (2013). Job crafting at the team and individual level: Implications for work engagement and performance. Group & Organization Management, 38(4), 427-454.

Tho, N. D. (2017). Knowledge transfer from business schools to business organizations: The roles absorptive capacity, learning motivation, acquired knowledge and job autonomy. Journal of Knowledge Management, 21(5), 1240-1253.

Thuan, L. C. (2021). Stimulating employee creativity by providing developmental feedback. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 29(2), 354-367.

Thuan, L. C., & Thanh, B. T. (2020). Mediating mechanisms linking developmental feedback with employee creativity. Journal of Workplace Learning, 32(2), 108-121.

van Dyne, L., & LePine, J. A. (1998). Helping and voice extra-role behaviors: Evidence of construct and predictive validity. Academy of Management Journal, 41(1), 108-119.

Wang, Y., & Lau, D. C. (2022). How and why job crafting influences creative performance? A resource allocation explanation of the curvilinear moderated relations. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 39(4), 1561-1587.

Wang, Y., Wang, X., & Xu, W. (2023). How does negative performance feedback affect a firm’s openness in its innovation search behaviour? The moderating role of organisational slack. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 35(4), 380-393.

Zhou, J. (2003). When the presence of creative coworkers is related to creativity: Role of supervisor close monitoring, developmental feedback, and creative personality. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(3), 413-422.