Tác động của chuyển đổi số và mức độ sử dụng kế toán quản trị đến hiệu quả bền vững: Vai trò điều tiết của lãnh đạo chuyển đổi tại các doanh nghiệp Việt Nam
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24311/jabes/2025.36.12.05Keywords:
Digital transformation, Management accounting systems, Transformational leadership, Sustainable performance; PLS-SEMAbstract
This study examines the structural relationships between digital transformation, management accounting system use, and sustainable performance, while evaluating the moderating influence of transformational leadership within the context of Vietnamese enterprises. Utilizing a partial least squares - structural equation modeling analysis of 326 valid survey responses, the findings reveal that digital transformation exerts a significant positive impact on both management accounting system use and sustainable performance. This research addresses a critical theoretical gap by elucidating the transmission mechanism through which digital infrastructure is converted into sustainable value via management accounting system use, which serves as a substantial partial mediator. Furthermore, the results confirm that transformational leadership significantly strengthens the positive effect of management accounting system use on sustainable performance. By integrating the resource-based view and the information systems success model, the study suggests that firms should prioritize real-time data standardization and cultivate digital leadership capabilities aligned with a triple bottom line orientation to optimize sustainable net benefits.
References
Arkhipova, D., Montemari, M., Mio, C., & Marasca, S. (2024). Digital technologies and the evolution of the management accounting profession: A grounded theory literature review. Meditari Accountancy Research, 32(7), 35-64. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEDAR-07-2023-2097
Armstrong, J. S., & Overton, T. S. (1977). Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys. Journal of Marketing Research, 14(3), 396-402. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224377701400320
Bass, B. M., & Avolio, B. J. (1993). Transformational leadership and organizational culture. Public Administration Quarterly, 17(1), 112-121. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40862298
Bass, B. M. (1999). Two decades of research and development in transformational leadership. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 8(1), 9-32. https://doi.org/10.1080/135943299398410
Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99-120. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700108
Baruch, Y., & Holtom, B. C. (2008). Survey response rate levels and trends in organizational research. Human Relations, 61(8), 1139-1160.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726708094863
Bhimani, A., & Willcocks, L. (2014). Digitisation, “Big Data”, and the transformation of accounting information. Accounting and Business Research, 44(4), 469-490. https://doi.org/10.1080/00014788.2014.910051
Bộ Chính trị. (2024). Nghị quyết số 57-NQ/TW về đột phá phát triển khoa học, công nghệ, đổi mới sáng tạo, và chuyển đổi số quốc gia, ban hành ngày 22/12/2024. Truy cập từ https://xaydungchinhsach.chinhphu.vn/toan-van-nghi-quyet-ve-dot-pha-phat-trien-khoa-hoc-cong-nghe-doi-moi-sang-tao-va-chuyen-doi-so-quoc-gia-119241224180048642.htm
Bộ Kế hoạch và Đầu tư, & Tổng cục Thống kê. (2024). Sách trắng doanh nghiệp Việt Nam 2024. Truy cập từ https://www.gso.gov.vn/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/Sach-trang-doanh-nghiep-Viet-Nam-2024.pdf
Carless, S. A., Wearing, A. J., & Mann, L. (2000). A short measure of transformational leadership. Journal of Business and Psychology, 14(3), 389-405. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022991115523
Chen, D., & Wang, S. (2024). Digital transformation, innovation capabilities, and servitization as drivers of ESG performance in manufacturing SMEs. Scientific Reports, 14(1), 24516. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-76416-8
Chenhall, R. H., & Morris, D. (1986). The impact of structure, environment, and interdependence on the perceived usefulness of management accounting systems. Accounting Review, 61, 16-35. https://www.econbiz.de/Record/the-impact-of-structure-environment-and-interdependence-on-the-perceived-usefulness-of-management-accounting-systems-chenhall-robert/10001013364
Cohen, J. (2016). A Power Primer (4th ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Davenport, T. H., & Ronanki, R. (2018). Artificial intelligence for the real world. Harvard Business Review, 96(1), 108-116. https://www.bizjournals.com/boston/news/2018/01/09/hbr-artificial-intelligence-for-the-real-world.html
DeLone, W. H., & McLean, E. R. (1992). Information systems success: The quest for the dependent variable. Information Systems Research, 3(1), 60-95. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.3.1.60
DeLone, W. H., & McLean, E. R. (2003). The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: A ten-year update. Journal of Management Information Systems, 19(4), 9-30. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2003.11045748
Elkington, J. (1997). The Triple Bottom Line. Environmental management: Readings and cases (pp. 49-66).
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104
Franke, F., & Hiebl, M. R. W. (2023). Big data and decision quality: The role of management accountants’ data analytics skills. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 69, 100574. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJAIM-12-2021-0246
George, G., Osinga, E. C., Lavie, D., & Scott, B. A. (2016). Big data and data science methods for management research. Academy of Management Journal, 59(5), 1493-1507. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2016.4005
Hahn, T., Figge, F., Pinkse, J., & Preuss, L. (2010). Trade‐offs in corporate sustainability: You can't have your cake and eat it. Business Strategy and The Environment, 19(4), 217-229. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.674
Hair Jr, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., Sarstedt, M., Danks, N. P., & Ray, S. (2021). Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) Using R: A Workbook. Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80519-7
Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115-135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8
Hess, T., Matt, C., Benlian, A., & Wiesböck, F. (2016). Options for formulating a digital transformation strategy. MIS Quarterly Executive, 15(2), 123-139. https://aisel.aisnet.org/misqe/vol15/iss2/6/
Hoch, J. E., Bommer, W. H., Dulebohn, J. H., & Wu, D. (2018). Do ethical, authentic, and servant leadership explain variance above and beyond transformational leadership? A meta-analysis. Journal of Management, 44(2), 501-529. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206316665461
LaValle, S., Lesser, E., Shockley, R., Hopkins, M. S., & Kruschwitz, N. (2011). Big data, analytics, and the path from insights to value. MIT Sloan Management Review, 52(2), 21-32. https://sloanreview.mit.edu/article/big-data-analytics-and-the-path-from-insights-to-value/
Li, X., Hsieh, J. P. A., & Rai, A. (2013). Motivational differences across post-acceptance information system usage behaviors: An investigation in the business intelligence systems context. Information Systems Research, 24(3), 659-682. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1120.0456
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Moll, J., & Yigitbasioglu, O. (2019). The role of internet-related technologies in shaping the work of accountants: New directions for accounting research. The British Accounting Review, 51(6), 100833. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2019.04.002
Montemari, M., & Nielsen, C. (2021). Big data for business modeling: Towards the next generation of performance measurement systems?. Management Control, 2021(S1), 5-10. https://doi.org/10.3280/MACO2021-001-S1001
Mudau, T. N., Cohen, J., & Papageorgiou, E. (2024). Determinants and consequences of routine and advanced use of business intelligence (BI) systems by management accountants. Information & Management, 61(1), 103888. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2023.103888
Nadkarni, S., & Prügl, R. (2021). Digital transformation: A review, synthesis, and opportunities for future research. Management Review Quarterly, 71(2), 233-341. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11301-020-00185-7
Nasiri, M., Ukko, J., Saunila, M., & Rantala, T. (2020). Managing the digital supply chain: The role of smart technologies. Technovation, 96-97, 102121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2020.102121
Pérez, A., & Rodríguez del Bosque, I. (2013). Measuring CSR image: Three studies to develop and to validate a reliable measurement tool. Journal of Business Ethics, 118(2), 265-286. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1588-8
Piwowar-Sulej, K., & Iqbal, Q. (2023). Leadership styles and sustainable performance: A systematic literature review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 382, 134600. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.134600
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879-903. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
Rao, P., & Holt, D. (2005). Do green supply chains lead to competitiveness and economic performance?. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 25(9), 898-916. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443570510613956
Rikhardsson, P., & Yigitbasioglu, O. (2018). Business intelligence & analytics in management accounting research: Status and future focus. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 29, 37-58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accinf.2018.03.001
Sarstedt, M., Hair, J. F., Pick, M., Liengaard, B. D., Radomir, L., & Ringle, C. M. (2022). Progress in partial least squares structural equation modeling use in marketing research in the last decade. Psychology & Marketing, 39(5), 1035-1064. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.21640
Teece, D. J. (2007). Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal, 28(13), 1319-1350. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.640
Thủ tướng Chính phủ. (2020). Quyết định số 749/QĐ-TTg phê duyệt “Chương trình Chuyển đổi số quốc gia đến năm 2025, định hướng đến năm 2030”, ban hành ngày 3/6/2020. Truy cập từ https://chinhphu.vn/default.aspx?pageid=27160&docid=200163
Thủ tướng Chính phủ. (2021). Quyết định số 942/QĐ-TTg phê duyệt “Chiến lược phát triển Chính phủ điện tử hướng tới Chính phủ số giai đoạn 2021-2025, định hướng đến năm 2030”, ban hành ngày 15/6/2021. Truy cập từ https://chinhphu.vn/?pageid=27160&docid=203403&tagid=6&type=1
Vial, G. (2021). Understanding digital transformation: A review and a research agenda. Managing digital transformation, 13-66. London: Routledge.
Wang, S., & Esperança, J. P. (2023). Can digital transformation improve market and ESG performance? Evidence from Chinese SMEs. Journal of Cleaner Production, 419, 137980. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.137980
Zhu, Q., Sarkis, J., & Lai, K. H. (2008). Confirmation of a measurement model for green supply chain management practices implementation. International Journal of Production Economics, 111(2), 261-273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2006.11.029
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 JOURNAL OF ASIAN BUSINESS AND ECONOMIC STUDIES
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
